Using a Semantic Knowledge Base to Improve the Management of Security Reports in Industrial DevOps Projects

Markus Voggenreiter, Ulrich Schöpp
{"title":"Using a Semantic Knowledge Base to Improve the Management of Security Reports in Industrial DevOps Projects","authors":"Markus Voggenreiter, Ulrich Schöpp","doi":"10.1145/3510457.3513065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating security activities into the software development lifecycle to detect security flaws is essential for any project. These activities produce reports that must be managed and looped back to project stakeholders like developers to enable security improvements. This so-called Feedback Loop is a crucial part of any project and is required by various industrial security standards and models. However, the operation of this loop presents a variety of challenges. These challenges range from ensuring that feedback data is of sufficient quality over providing different stakeholders with the information they need to the enormous effort to manage the reports. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for treating findings from security activity reports as belief in a Knowledge Base (KB). By utilizing continuous logical inferences, we derive information necessary for practitioners and address existing challenges in the industry. This approach is currently evaluated in industrial DevOps projects, using data from continuous security testing.","PeriodicalId":119790,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510457.3513065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Integrating security activities into the software development lifecycle to detect security flaws is essential for any project. These activities produce reports that must be managed and looped back to project stakeholders like developers to enable security improvements. This so-called Feedback Loop is a crucial part of any project and is required by various industrial security standards and models. However, the operation of this loop presents a variety of challenges. These challenges range from ensuring that feedback data is of sufficient quality over providing different stakeholders with the information they need to the enormous effort to manage the reports. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for treating findings from security activity reports as belief in a Knowledge Base (KB). By utilizing continuous logical inferences, we derive information necessary for practitioners and address existing challenges in the industry. This approach is currently evaluated in industrial DevOps projects, using data from continuous security testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用语义知识库改进工业开发运维项目中安全报告的管理
将安全活动集成到软件开发生命周期中以检测安全缺陷对于任何项目都是必不可少的。这些活动产生的报告必须进行管理,并反馈给项目涉众(如开发人员),以支持安全性改进。这个所谓的反馈回路是任何项目的关键部分,也是各种工业安全标准和模型所要求的。然而,这个循环的操作提出了各种各样的挑战。这些挑战包括确保反馈数据具有足够的质量,为不同的涉众提供他们所需的信息,以及管理报告的巨大努力。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法,将来自安全活动报告的发现视为知识库(KB)中的信念。通过使用连续的逻辑推理,我们获得从业者所需的信息,并解决行业中存在的挑战。这种方法目前在工业DevOps项目中进行评估,使用来自持续安全测试的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Industry's Cry for Tools that Support Large-Scale Refactoring Code Reviewer Recommendation in Tencent: Practice, Challenge, and Direction* What's bothering developers in code review? The Impact of Flaky Tests on Historical Test Prioritization on Chrome Surveying the Developer Experience of Flaky Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1