Evaluating safety and risk awareness in contact sports: development of a quantitative survey for elite rugby

Yanbing Chen, Seamus T. Kelly, C. Buggy
{"title":"Evaluating safety and risk awareness in contact sports: development of a quantitative survey for elite rugby","authors":"Yanbing Chen, Seamus T. Kelly, C. Buggy","doi":"10.24840/2184-0954_006.001_0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Considerable media attention has recently focused on an increased number of professional athletes that experience forced retirement due to severe injuries. Despite the highly completive, physical nature and tolerance of risk in contact sports, no Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) awareness-related measurement instrument exists in professional sports. As part of a wider project, this study aimed to develop a survey instrument to evaluate risk and safety awareness in sports, taking elite rugby (union) as an example. Methods: Based on the identified conceptual framework incorporating theories from the OSH discipline, the survey has been updated for three rounds according to the feedback from a multidisciplinary team of experts before the pilot test. The pilot test data (n=46, response rate 76.7%) were imported to SPSS for analysis and validation. The survey's key themes included health outlook, tackle behavior, awareness of risk acceptance, reasons for risk-taking, and safety consideration for other players. Results: Overall, the survey has a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.742). Some sections of the survey require a further factor analysis, such as awareness of risk acceptance during the competition (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy - KMO <0.767, p<0.001) and reasons for risk-taking (KMO<0.604, p=0.003). Some sections require a larger sample size for further validation, such as safety consideration for other players (KMO<0.481, p<0.001). Conclusion: This is the first survey that evaluates players' safety and risk awareness in rugby drawing upon OSH concepts. Such a survey has the potential to improve athletes' health and wellbeing by customized educational intervention, which could point the way forward for its application in a wider range of sport settings internationally.","PeriodicalId":201704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2184-0954_006.001_0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Considerable media attention has recently focused on an increased number of professional athletes that experience forced retirement due to severe injuries. Despite the highly completive, physical nature and tolerance of risk in contact sports, no Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) awareness-related measurement instrument exists in professional sports. As part of a wider project, this study aimed to develop a survey instrument to evaluate risk and safety awareness in sports, taking elite rugby (union) as an example. Methods: Based on the identified conceptual framework incorporating theories from the OSH discipline, the survey has been updated for three rounds according to the feedback from a multidisciplinary team of experts before the pilot test. The pilot test data (n=46, response rate 76.7%) were imported to SPSS for analysis and validation. The survey's key themes included health outlook, tackle behavior, awareness of risk acceptance, reasons for risk-taking, and safety consideration for other players. Results: Overall, the survey has a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.742). Some sections of the survey require a further factor analysis, such as awareness of risk acceptance during the competition (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy - KMO <0.767, p<0.001) and reasons for risk-taking (KMO<0.604, p=0.003). Some sections require a larger sample size for further validation, such as safety consideration for other players (KMO<0.481, p<0.001). Conclusion: This is the first survey that evaluates players' safety and risk awareness in rugby drawing upon OSH concepts. Such a survey has the potential to improve athletes' health and wellbeing by customized educational intervention, which could point the way forward for its application in a wider range of sport settings internationally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接触性运动中安全与风险意识的评估:精英橄榄球定量调查的发展
导读:最近,媒体的注意力集中在越来越多的职业运动员由于严重受伤而被迫退役的问题上。尽管接触性运动具有高度的竞争性、体制性和风险承受力,但在职业体育运动中却没有职业安全与健康(OSH)意识相关的测量工具。作为一个更广泛项目的一部分,本研究旨在开发一种调查工具来评估体育运动中的风险和安全意识,以精英橄榄球(联盟)为例。方法:基于已确定的概念框架,结合职业安全与卫生学科的理论,在试点测试之前,根据多学科专家团队的反馈,调查已进行了三轮更新。将中试数据(n=46,有效率76.7%)导入SPSS进行分析验证。该调查的主要主题包括健康前景、解决行为、风险接受意识、冒险的原因以及对其他玩家的安全考虑。结果:总体而言,调查具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α= 0.742)。调查的某些部分需要进一步的因素分析,例如在竞争期间的风险接受意识(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin抽样充分性测量- KMO< 0.767, p<0.001)和冒险的原因(KMO<0.604, p=0.003)。有些部分需要更大的样本量来进一步验证,例如考虑到其他玩家的安全性(KMO<0.481, p<0.001)。结论:这是第一个基于职业安全卫生概念评估橄榄球运动员安全和风险意识的调查。这样的调查有可能通过定制的教育干预来改善运动员的健康和福祉,这可能为其在国际上更广泛的运动环境中的应用指明方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equipment and advances for measuring fatigue in office settings: systematic review protocol Occupational exposure and health of wildland firefighters: protocol for a systematic review Equipment and advances for measuring fatigue in office settings: systematic review protocol Safety mandates, legal requirements, and management practices to provide employees with a safe and healthful work environment Burnout and depression among college students pursuing Bachelor of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, in Delhi NCR - a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1