Intensive Care Associated Experiences of Extremely Premature Infants Who Die

Lyubov Tiegs, Erin Rholl, S. McDonnell, J. Paradise, M. Uhing, M. Basir
{"title":"Intensive Care Associated Experiences of Extremely Premature Infants Who Die","authors":"Lyubov Tiegs, Erin Rholl, S. McDonnell, J. Paradise, M. Uhing, M. Basir","doi":"10.29011/2577-2236.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pain and quality of death are important considerations in treatment choices for children. Our objective is to assess the intensive care-associated experiences of 22-25 weeks gestational age (GA) infants who die despite intensive care treatment. Study Design: In a 1:1 case-control study, medical records were screened for all inborn 22-25 weeks GA infants who received intensive care treatments between 2014 and 2020. Cases were all infants who died. Each case was matched by GA and birth weight to an infant who survived to discharge (control). Data was collected on cases and controls for a matched timeframe based on the case’s duration of intensive care treatment. Information collected included intensive care-associated negative experiences (invasive procedures, surgeries, use of pain medication) and positive experiences (enteral feedings, being held by family). Results: The cases (n=20) survived for 0 to 93 days, with median (IQR) survival 8 (5, 24) days. The mean (SD) number of invasive procedures was higher for cases than controls, 34 (30) vs. 24 (22), p=0.004. Cases underwent 8 surgeries compared to 4 in the controls. Additionally, compared to controls, cases spent more time receiving pain medications (64% vs. 27%, p<0.001) and without being fed (54% vs. 39%, p<0.001). Half of cases were never held by parents until the day they died. Conclusion: Extremely premature infants who die despite intensive care face more treatment burdens than the survivors. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and gather information necessary for informed decisions about intensive care treatment of these infants. Obstetrics & Gynecology: Open Access Tiegs L, et al. Gynecol Obstet Open Acc 7: 161. www.doi.org/10.29011/2577-2236.100161 www.gavinpublishers.com","PeriodicalId":365505,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology: Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2577-2236.100161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pain and quality of death are important considerations in treatment choices for children. Our objective is to assess the intensive care-associated experiences of 22-25 weeks gestational age (GA) infants who die despite intensive care treatment. Study Design: In a 1:1 case-control study, medical records were screened for all inborn 22-25 weeks GA infants who received intensive care treatments between 2014 and 2020. Cases were all infants who died. Each case was matched by GA and birth weight to an infant who survived to discharge (control). Data was collected on cases and controls for a matched timeframe based on the case’s duration of intensive care treatment. Information collected included intensive care-associated negative experiences (invasive procedures, surgeries, use of pain medication) and positive experiences (enteral feedings, being held by family). Results: The cases (n=20) survived for 0 to 93 days, with median (IQR) survival 8 (5, 24) days. The mean (SD) number of invasive procedures was higher for cases than controls, 34 (30) vs. 24 (22), p=0.004. Cases underwent 8 surgeries compared to 4 in the controls. Additionally, compared to controls, cases spent more time receiving pain medications (64% vs. 27%, p<0.001) and without being fed (54% vs. 39%, p<0.001). Half of cases were never held by parents until the day they died. Conclusion: Extremely premature infants who die despite intensive care face more treatment burdens than the survivors. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and gather information necessary for informed decisions about intensive care treatment of these infants. Obstetrics & Gynecology: Open Access Tiegs L, et al. Gynecol Obstet Open Acc 7: 161. www.doi.org/10.29011/2577-2236.100161 www.gavinpublishers.com
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极度早产儿死亡的重症监护相关经验
目的:疼痛和死亡质量是儿童治疗选择的重要考虑因素。我们的目的是评估22-25周胎龄(GA)婴儿在重症监护治疗后死亡的重症监护相关经验。研究设计:在一项1:1的病例对照研究中,筛选了2014年至2020年期间接受重症监护治疗的所有22-25周出生的GA婴儿的医疗记录。病例均为死亡的婴儿。每个病例通过GA和出生体重与存活至出院的婴儿(对照组)相匹配。根据病例重症监护治疗的持续时间,收集病例和对照的数据。收集的信息包括与重症监护相关的负面经历(侵入性手术、手术、使用止痛药)和积极经历(肠内喂养,由家人主持)。结果:20例患者存活0 ~ 93天,中位(IQR)生存8(5,24)天。有创手术的平均次数(SD)高于对照组,34(30)比24 (22),p=0.004。病例进行了8次手术,对照组为4次。此外,与对照组相比,患者接受止痛药治疗的时间更长(64%对27%,p<0.001),不进食的时间更长(54%对39%,p<0.001)。一半的病例直到他们去世的那天都没有被父母抱过。结论:在重症监护下死亡的极早产儿比幸存者面临更大的治疗负担。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现,并收集必要的信息,以便对这些婴儿进行重症监护治疗。妇产科学:开放获取Tiegs L等。妇产科开放Acc 7: 161。www.doi.org/10.29011/2577 - 2236.100161 www.gavinpublishers.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COFS Syndrome in a Non-Consanguineous Marriage Threatened Miscarriage in a Bicornuate Uterus: With the Baby in the Right Cornua and Subchorionic Hematoma in The Left Cornua Conservative Management of Incarcerated Gravid Uterus Efficacy of Oral Misoprostol Compared with Vaginal Dinoprostone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Innovations in Recovery Programs in Maternal and Neonatal Health: Experiences from a Hospital Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1