{"title":"A new optimization approach to the general single machine earliness-tardiness problem","authors":"Yunpeng Pan, Leyuan Shi, Hoksung Yau","doi":"10.1109/COASE.2005.1506743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we consider the single-machine earliness-tardiness (E-T) scheduling problem with distinct release dates, due dates, and E-T costs. The problem is formulated using dynamic programming. The solution procedure embodies a new hybrid optimization approach called generalized dynamic programming (GDP), which incorporates techniques from two methodologies: dynamic programming and branch-and-bound. An assignment-based lower bound is employed in branch-and-bound. We test 135 random instances with up to 30 jobs to evaluate the algorithm's performance. It shows that the GDP approach achieves much better results than linear programming-based branch-and-bound algorithms such as those included in the commercial package, CPLEX.","PeriodicalId":181408,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2005.1506743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the single-machine earliness-tardiness (E-T) scheduling problem with distinct release dates, due dates, and E-T costs. The problem is formulated using dynamic programming. The solution procedure embodies a new hybrid optimization approach called generalized dynamic programming (GDP), which incorporates techniques from two methodologies: dynamic programming and branch-and-bound. An assignment-based lower bound is employed in branch-and-bound. We test 135 random instances with up to 30 jobs to evaluate the algorithm's performance. It shows that the GDP approach achieves much better results than linear programming-based branch-and-bound algorithms such as those included in the commercial package, CPLEX.