Unifying view of recent LALR(1) lookahead set algorithms

F. Ives
{"title":"Unifying view of recent LALR(1) lookahead set algorithms","authors":"F. Ives","doi":"10.1145/12276.13324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the introduction of LALR parsing, several algorithms have been presented for the computation of the lookahead sets needed to produce an LALR parser. The algorithm in Aho and Ullman[1] has perhaps received the widest exposure. The recent algorithms by DeRemer and Pennello[2] and Park, Choe, and Chang[4] are the most efficient.\nA new algorithm has been developed from an algorithm originally based on the Aho and Ullman algorithm and subsequently modified to take advantage of the efficiencies introduced by the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The new algorithm performs better than the Park, Choe, and Chang algorithm, and both perform better than the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The reasons for the relative performances are easily understood when the algorithms are presented in a common light.","PeriodicalId":414056,"journal":{"name":"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/12276.13324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Since the introduction of LALR parsing, several algorithms have been presented for the computation of the lookahead sets needed to produce an LALR parser. The algorithm in Aho and Ullman[1] has perhaps received the widest exposure. The recent algorithms by DeRemer and Pennello[2] and Park, Choe, and Chang[4] are the most efficient. A new algorithm has been developed from an algorithm originally based on the Aho and Ullman algorithm and subsequently modified to take advantage of the efficiencies introduced by the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The new algorithm performs better than the Park, Choe, and Chang algorithm, and both perform better than the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The reasons for the relative performances are easily understood when the algorithms are presented in a common light.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近LALR(1)前瞻集算法的统一观点
自从引入LALR解析以来,已经提出了几种算法来计算生成LALR解析器所需的前瞻集。Aho和Ullman[1]中的算法可能得到了最广泛的曝光。最近由DeRemer和Pennello[2]以及Park, Choe, and Chang[4]提出的算法是最有效的。该算法最初基于Aho和Ullman算法,随后进行了修改,以利用DeRemer和Pennello算法引入的效率,从而开发了一种新的算法。新算法的性能优于Park、Choe、Chang算法,也优于DeRemer和Pennello算法。当这些算法以一种共同的方式呈现时,相对性能的原因很容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A practical method for syntactic error diagnosis and recovery The CIMS PL/I compiler A Fortran 77 interpreter for mutation analysis Cint: a RISC interpreter for the C programming language The Illinois functional programming interpreter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1