J A Whitworth, B A Scoggins, J Andrews, P M Williamson, M A Brown
{"title":"Haemodynamic and metabolic effects of short term administration of synthetic sex steroids in humans.","authors":"J A Whitworth, B A Scoggins, J Andrews, P M Williamson, M A Brown","doi":"10.3109/10641969209036226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic sex steroid administration is a major cause of iatrogenic hypertension but little is known of the haemodynamic or metabolic consequences of these steroids. This study examined the short term blood pressure, volume and metabolic consequences of 5 day administration of synthetic androgen to normal men and synthetic oestrogen or progestogen to normal women. Healthy subjects (8 women, 6 men) on a constant diet took part in each of 3 studies. Males received testosterone undecanoate 120 mg/day (n = 6) and females either ethinyloestradiol 0.3 mg/day (n = 5) or norethisterone 15 mg/day (n = 6) for 5 days in the last week of the cycle. Norethisterone increased lying (+7 mmHg) and standing (+8 mmHg) systolic pressure but the other steroids did not alter blood pressure. All 3 treatments increased body weight. There were no consistent changes in plasma electrolytes or glucose with any steroid, and no urinary sodium retention or changes in urine Na:K ratio. Haematocrit fell on ethinyloestradiol but no steroid significantly increased plasma volume (measured as volume of distribution of 125I human serum albumin). Renin substrate and cortisol rose and renin concentration fell on ethinyloestradiol. These studies suggest that the progestogen component may contribute to the blood pressure raising effects of oral contraceptives.</p>","PeriodicalId":10339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","volume":"14 5","pages":"905-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641969209036226","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969209036226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Synthetic sex steroid administration is a major cause of iatrogenic hypertension but little is known of the haemodynamic or metabolic consequences of these steroids. This study examined the short term blood pressure, volume and metabolic consequences of 5 day administration of synthetic androgen to normal men and synthetic oestrogen or progestogen to normal women. Healthy subjects (8 women, 6 men) on a constant diet took part in each of 3 studies. Males received testosterone undecanoate 120 mg/day (n = 6) and females either ethinyloestradiol 0.3 mg/day (n = 5) or norethisterone 15 mg/day (n = 6) for 5 days in the last week of the cycle. Norethisterone increased lying (+7 mmHg) and standing (+8 mmHg) systolic pressure but the other steroids did not alter blood pressure. All 3 treatments increased body weight. There were no consistent changes in plasma electrolytes or glucose with any steroid, and no urinary sodium retention or changes in urine Na:K ratio. Haematocrit fell on ethinyloestradiol but no steroid significantly increased plasma volume (measured as volume of distribution of 125I human serum albumin). Renin substrate and cortisol rose and renin concentration fell on ethinyloestradiol. These studies suggest that the progestogen component may contribute to the blood pressure raising effects of oral contraceptives.