Impacts of the Contradictory Factors in Algal Co2 Sequestration with Sustainable Biofuel Benefit

Ziyu Liu, C. LONDON), Shujun Han, Xiaoyi Yang
{"title":"Impacts of the Contradictory Factors in Algal Co2 Sequestration with Sustainable Biofuel Benefit","authors":"Ziyu Liu, C. LONDON), Shujun Han, Xiaoyi Yang","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.20809/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background The purpose would discover the impacts of the contradictory factors in application of algae in CO2 sequestration with sustainable biofuel benefit. The quantitively assessment model and approach have been established coupling upstream CO2 source and deliverables with downstream algal biofuel deliverables at the uniform algae level of Nannochloropsis oceanica, which would be benefit for algae biofuel deliverables choice. The functional units have been defined at energy consumption (MJ) per final mass product (algae, jet biofuels by three refining pathways, biodiesels by three refining pathways) and energy consumption (MJ) per final energy yield (algae, jet biofuels, biodiesels). Computational framework is classified into three sub-models, including CO2 source and deliverable model, algae cultivation and deliverable model, refining process and biofuel deliverable model. This life cycle assessment investigated the following impacts: transportation distances and purification modes with flue gas CO2 concentrations, lipid content with specific productivity and CO2 biofixation coupling the nutrient supply, final products including algae, jet biofuel and biodiesel.Results Coupling the influence of transportation distances and purification modes on the energy consumption, flue gas with a wide range of CO2 concentration was compared for two type deliverables including algal CO2, edible CO2. flue gas with low CO2 concentration is appropriate for on-site algal CO2 deliverable within 10km while flue gas with above 95% CO2 is flexible to transportation distance and appropriate for edible CO2 deliverable. Specific productivities and CO2 fixation both comply with negatively logarithmic relationship with lipid contents. Coupling the effects of algae specific productivity and CO2 evaporation loss, the total CO2 fixation efficiencies were investigated above 90% at below 28 % lipid but obviously decrease at above 40% lipid. The nutrient supply enhances specific productivity and protein content but with indirect energy consumption. The total energy consumptions of different target products with upstream CO2 source and algae to downstream biofuel were calculated quantitatively on edible algae and general algae.Conclusions Biodieselwet and HTL-HRJ jet biofuel performed the priorities in energy consumption. Lipid content and profile defined biofuel deliverables in quantity and quality. The LCA indicated that allocation is a crucial issue to balance energy, environment and economy decision on target product choice and by-products. Coupling solar energy utilization and by-product of bioactive nutrients effects, the positive energy gains have been investigated at a wide range of lipid contents despite of jet biofuel or biodiesel. The results would enhance the interests in both LCA and application of algae in CO2 sequestration with sustainable biofuel benefit.","PeriodicalId":105811,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.20809/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The purpose would discover the impacts of the contradictory factors in application of algae in CO2 sequestration with sustainable biofuel benefit. The quantitively assessment model and approach have been established coupling upstream CO2 source and deliverables with downstream algal biofuel deliverables at the uniform algae level of Nannochloropsis oceanica, which would be benefit for algae biofuel deliverables choice. The functional units have been defined at energy consumption (MJ) per final mass product (algae, jet biofuels by three refining pathways, biodiesels by three refining pathways) and energy consumption (MJ) per final energy yield (algae, jet biofuels, biodiesels). Computational framework is classified into three sub-models, including CO2 source and deliverable model, algae cultivation and deliverable model, refining process and biofuel deliverable model. This life cycle assessment investigated the following impacts: transportation distances and purification modes with flue gas CO2 concentrations, lipid content with specific productivity and CO2 biofixation coupling the nutrient supply, final products including algae, jet biofuel and biodiesel.Results Coupling the influence of transportation distances and purification modes on the energy consumption, flue gas with a wide range of CO2 concentration was compared for two type deliverables including algal CO2, edible CO2. flue gas with low CO2 concentration is appropriate for on-site algal CO2 deliverable within 10km while flue gas with above 95% CO2 is flexible to transportation distance and appropriate for edible CO2 deliverable. Specific productivities and CO2 fixation both comply with negatively logarithmic relationship with lipid contents. Coupling the effects of algae specific productivity and CO2 evaporation loss, the total CO2 fixation efficiencies were investigated above 90% at below 28 % lipid but obviously decrease at above 40% lipid. The nutrient supply enhances specific productivity and protein content but with indirect energy consumption. The total energy consumptions of different target products with upstream CO2 source and algae to downstream biofuel were calculated quantitatively on edible algae and general algae.Conclusions Biodieselwet and HTL-HRJ jet biofuel performed the priorities in energy consumption. Lipid content and profile defined biofuel deliverables in quantity and quality. The LCA indicated that allocation is a crucial issue to balance energy, environment and economy decision on target product choice and by-products. Coupling solar energy utilization and by-product of bioactive nutrients effects, the positive energy gains have been investigated at a wide range of lipid contents despite of jet biofuel or biodiesel. The results would enhance the interests in both LCA and application of algae in CO2 sequestration with sustainable biofuel benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矛盾因素对藻类Co2固存与生物燃料可持续效益的影响
研究背景探讨藻类在二氧化碳固存和生物燃料可持续效益应用中的矛盾因素的影响。建立了在海洋纳米绿藻统一藻类水平上将上游CO2源和可交付物与下游藻类生物燃料可交付物耦合的定量评价模型和方法,有利于藻类生物燃料可交付物的选择。功能单位被定义为每最终批量产品(藻类、三种精炼途径的喷气生物燃料、三种精炼途径的生物柴油)的能耗(MJ)和每最终能量产出(藻类、喷气生物燃料、生物柴油)的能耗(MJ)。计算框架分为CO2源及可交付模型、藻类培养及可交付模型、炼油过程及生物燃料可交付模型三个子模型。该生命周期评估研究了以下影响:运输距离和净化方式与烟气CO2浓度、具有比生产力的脂质含量和与营养供应耦合的CO2生物固定、最终产品包括藻类、喷气生物燃料和生物柴油。结果结合运输距离和净化方式对能源消耗的影响,比较了藻类CO2和食用CO2两类可交付物的大范围CO2浓度烟气。CO2浓度较低的烟气适用于现场10公里以内的藻类CO2输送,CO2浓度95%以上的烟气适用于可食用的CO2输送。比生产率和CO2固定量均与脂质含量呈负对数关系。藻类比生产力和CO2蒸发损失的耦合效应表明,在脂含量低于28%时,总CO2固定效率在90%以上,而在脂含量高于40%时,总CO2固定效率明显下降。养分供给提高了比生产力和蛋白质含量,但间接消耗了能量。在食用藻类和一般藻类上,定量计算了上游CO2源和藻类对下游生物燃料的不同目标产品的总能耗。结论生物柴油和HTL-HRJ喷气生物燃料的能耗优先。脂质含量和剖面定义了生物燃料交付物的数量和质量。LCA分析表明,在目标产品选择和副产品选择上,分配是平衡能源、环境和经济决策的关键问题。耦合太阳能利用和生物活性营养物质的副产品效应,在广泛的脂质含量下研究了喷气生物燃料或生物柴油的正能量增益。该研究结果将提高人们对LCA和藻类在二氧化碳封存中的应用的兴趣,并具有可持续的生物燃料效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race and Environmental Worries Climate Change and (a Culture of) Cooperation in the World's Most Agricultural Countries. Strengthening Gender Justice in a Just Transition: A Research Agenda Based on a Systematic Map of Gender in Coal Transitions Demand Shocks and Supply Chain Resilience: An Agent Based Modelling Approach and Application to the Potato Supply Chain Oil Shocks and the U.S. Economy in a Data-rich Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1