Recurrent pregnancy loss resulting in IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) series. Pathophysiologic mapping. A systematic review

{"title":"Recurrent pregnancy loss resulting in IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) series. Pathophysiologic mapping. A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ahor.04.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Assiduous depiction of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in patients after in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Material and Method: Women undergoing IVF treatment who had experienced two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 20 weeks’ gestation with or without a history of implantation failure. Systematic review resulting in specific data bases such as Pub Med and Cochrane data base. Results: Factors associated with RPL after IVF consist mainly genetic origin (approx. 30%) due to aneuploid embryos, followed by thrombophilia and autoimmune factors. Mainly predisposition factors associated with high risk of recurrent miscarriages include obesity, advanced maternal age, anatomic defects of the uterus and endocrine disorders. On the contrary, 10-15% of cases of RPL represent idiopathic origin (Unexplained RPL). The evaluation of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) remains a controversial entity. Conclusion: The aim of our study is focusing on the pathophysiologic mapping, presented in current literature, concerning RPL after IVF. Although IVF procedures, including assisted hatching, PGT and immunologic therapy have been suggested to improve live birth rates, their efficacy is controversial, since the factors related to RPL after spontaneous abortion or IVF do not reveal any statistic differences. Additionally, assisted reproductive technique (ART) cannot be supported as a treatment intervention for couples with unexplained RPL, due to the lack of adequate clinical studies.","PeriodicalId":134553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology and Oncology Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology and Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ahor.04.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assiduous depiction of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in patients after in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Material and Method: Women undergoing IVF treatment who had experienced two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 20 weeks’ gestation with or without a history of implantation failure. Systematic review resulting in specific data bases such as Pub Med and Cochrane data base. Results: Factors associated with RPL after IVF consist mainly genetic origin (approx. 30%) due to aneuploid embryos, followed by thrombophilia and autoimmune factors. Mainly predisposition factors associated with high risk of recurrent miscarriages include obesity, advanced maternal age, anatomic defects of the uterus and endocrine disorders. On the contrary, 10-15% of cases of RPL represent idiopathic origin (Unexplained RPL). The evaluation of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) remains a controversial entity. Conclusion: The aim of our study is focusing on the pathophysiologic mapping, presented in current literature, concerning RPL after IVF. Although IVF procedures, including assisted hatching, PGT and immunologic therapy have been suggested to improve live birth rates, their efficacy is controversial, since the factors related to RPL after spontaneous abortion or IVF do not reveal any statistic differences. Additionally, assisted reproductive technique (ART) cannot be supported as a treatment intervention for couples with unexplained RPL, due to the lack of adequate clinical studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导致IVF(体外受精)系列的复发性妊娠丢失。病理生理的映射。系统回顾
目的:对体外受精(IVF)后复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)进行详细描述。材料和方法:接受体外受精治疗的妇女,在妊娠20周之前经历两次或两次以上连续妊娠失败,伴有或无植入失败史。系统评价产生特定的数据库,如Pub Med和Cochrane数据库。结果:与体外受精后RPL相关的因素主要包括遗传来源(约占10%)。30%)由于非整倍体胚胎,其次是血栓和自身免疫性因素。与复发性流产高风险相关的易感因素主要有肥胖、高龄、子宫解剖缺陷和内分泌紊乱。相反,10-15%的RPL病例为特发性起源(不明原因的RPL)。胚胎植入前基因检测(PGT)的评估仍然是一个有争议的实体。结论:我们研究的目的是关注目前文献中关于体外受精后RPL的病理生理定位。虽然IVF手术,包括辅助孵化,PGT和免疫治疗已被建议提高活产率,但其有效性存在争议,因为与自然流产或IVF后RPL相关的因素没有显示任何统计差异。此外,由于缺乏足够的临床研究,辅助生殖技术(ART)不能被支持作为一种治疗干预措施,用于不明原因的RPL夫妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distribution of Cancer of Multiple Myeloma in Jamaica 2008 A Case Report of Primary Central Nervous T-Cell Lymphoma in an Immunologically Competent Patient Laboratory Practice of Reference Intervals Modification for Children’s Blood Cell Analysis in China What about Non-AIDS Associated Kaposi’s Sarcoma? Clinical Features and Efficacy of Chemotherapy: A Monocentric Experience Top Twelve Cancers in Jamaica 2008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1