How Evaluation Expert’s Teams of Pubmed Central (PMC) and SCOPUS Indexed Databases Making Quality Assessment of the Journals – a Case of International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare (IJBH) Journal

I. Masic
{"title":"How Evaluation Expert’s Teams of Pubmed Central (PMC) and SCOPUS Indexed Databases Making Quality Assessment of the Journals – a Case of International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare (IJBH) Journal","authors":"I. Masic","doi":"10.5455/ijbh.2023.11.78-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Scientific researchers in the field of biomedicine have the role to interact through published articles in the scientific journal or presentations at scientific and professional conferences because on this way they can affect to the practices that can make people healthier and more satisfied with outcomes of health care systems. For this reason, scientists are encouraged, especially young ones, that after complete the project and finalyze their research investigation to publish scientific work outcomes in a professional and scientific journals. Objective: The aim of this article is to present the current tools available in scientometry for the evaluation of scientific validity of published articles and explain the purpose and, also, to describe the role of important indexed database in dissemination knowledge through the biomedical journals. Methods: Author searched the most influential on-line databases and analyzed deposited papers within the topic scientometrics and used descriptive method of reviewing important facts about experiences with scientometrics in the scientific and academic practice. Results and Discussion: Bibliometric methods are used for quantitative analysis of written materials. Citation provides guidelines for scientific work, because it stimulates scientists to deal with the most current areas of research, and organizes scientific article at the world level, or shapes and directs it. Citation is influenced by: article quality, understanding of the article, language in which the article is written, loyalty to a group of researchers, article type, etc. Some of the indicators used in the evaluation of scientific work are: Impact factor (IF); Citation of the article; Journal citations; Number and order of authors, etc. Impact Factor is the number of citations of articles published in the journal during the previous two years divided by the total number of articles published in the journal during the same period. Factor of influence depends on: the quality of the journal, the language on which it was printed, the area it covers, the journal distribution system. Conclusion: In this article we pointed that h-Index and Google Scholar indexes presents one of a set of valuable measures to determine scientific excellence. Although the h-Index is a better measure than a citation impact factor (IF), it is still based on the opinions of other authors. Since research in medicine can affect the improvement of clinical and public health practices, it is necessary to conduct them. Only quality research with exact results offers the scientific community new information about the examined problem, and the researcher personal satisfaction, the possibility of communicating and conducting scientific dialogue with other members of the academic community, and opening opportunities to receive critical review of those who have insight into the research.","PeriodicalId":187078,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Biomedicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2023.11.78-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Scientific researchers in the field of biomedicine have the role to interact through published articles in the scientific journal or presentations at scientific and professional conferences because on this way they can affect to the practices that can make people healthier and more satisfied with outcomes of health care systems. For this reason, scientists are encouraged, especially young ones, that after complete the project and finalyze their research investigation to publish scientific work outcomes in a professional and scientific journals. Objective: The aim of this article is to present the current tools available in scientometry for the evaluation of scientific validity of published articles and explain the purpose and, also, to describe the role of important indexed database in dissemination knowledge through the biomedical journals. Methods: Author searched the most influential on-line databases and analyzed deposited papers within the topic scientometrics and used descriptive method of reviewing important facts about experiences with scientometrics in the scientific and academic practice. Results and Discussion: Bibliometric methods are used for quantitative analysis of written materials. Citation provides guidelines for scientific work, because it stimulates scientists to deal with the most current areas of research, and organizes scientific article at the world level, or shapes and directs it. Citation is influenced by: article quality, understanding of the article, language in which the article is written, loyalty to a group of researchers, article type, etc. Some of the indicators used in the evaluation of scientific work are: Impact factor (IF); Citation of the article; Journal citations; Number and order of authors, etc. Impact Factor is the number of citations of articles published in the journal during the previous two years divided by the total number of articles published in the journal during the same period. Factor of influence depends on: the quality of the journal, the language on which it was printed, the area it covers, the journal distribution system. Conclusion: In this article we pointed that h-Index and Google Scholar indexes presents one of a set of valuable measures to determine scientific excellence. Although the h-Index is a better measure than a citation impact factor (IF), it is still based on the opinions of other authors. Since research in medicine can affect the improvement of clinical and public health practices, it is necessary to conduct them. Only quality research with exact results offers the scientific community new information about the examined problem, and the researcher personal satisfaction, the possibility of communicating and conducting scientific dialogue with other members of the academic community, and opening opportunities to receive critical review of those who have insight into the research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pubmed Central (PMC)和SCOPUS数据库评价专家组如何对期刊进行质量评价——以国际生物医学与卫生期刊(IJBH)为例
背景:生物医学领域的科学研究人员通过在科学期刊上发表文章或在科学和专业会议上发表演讲来进行互动,因为通过这种方式,他们可以影响可以使人们更健康和更满意卫生保健系统结果的实践。因此,鼓励科学家,特别是年轻的科学家,在完成项目并完成研究调查后,在专业的科学期刊上发表科学工作成果。目的:本文的目的是介绍科学计量学中用于评价已发表文章科学效度的现有工具,并解释其目的,同时描述重要的索引数据库在通过生物医学期刊传播知识方面的作用。方法:检索最具影响力的在线数据库,对科学计量学领域的论文进行分析,并采用描述性方法回顾科学计量学在科学和学术实践中的重要经验。结果与讨论:文献计量学方法用于书面材料的定量分析。引文为科学工作提供了指导方针,因为它激励科学家处理最新的研究领域,并在世界范围内组织科学文章,或塑造和指导它。引用受以下因素影响:文章质量、对文章的理解、文章的写作语言、对研究人员群体的忠诚度、文章类型等。一些用于评价科学工作的指标是:影响因子(IF);文章引用;期刊引用;作者的数量和顺序等。影响因子是该期刊前两年发表的文章被引用次数除以该期刊同期发表的文章总数。影响因素取决于:期刊的质量、印刷语言、覆盖区域、期刊发行系统。结论:本文指出h-Index和Google Scholar索引是确定科学卓越性的一套有价值的指标之一。虽然h-Index是一个比引用影响因子(IF)更好的衡量指标,但它仍然是基于其他作者的意见。由于医学研究可以影响临床和公共卫生实践的改善,因此有必要进行研究。只有具有准确结果的高质量研究才能为科学界提供有关所研究问题的新信息,以及研究人员个人满意度,与学术界其他成员进行交流和科学对话的可能性,并开放机会接受那些对研究有见解的人的批判性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Expert Systems and Information and Communicaton Tchnologies (ICT) in Laboratory Practice–an Economical Aspects Evaluation of Dental Health Care Efficiency in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina During Eight Years' Time Frame Intraosseous Lipoma of the Jaws: An Overview Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Metabolic Syndrome and its Predictors in an Urban Population in the Gambia: a Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1