THE PROFILE OF ANTIBIOTIC PRESCRIPTIONS IN PEDIATRIC OUTPATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

O. Horodnycha, A. Zimenkovsky
{"title":"THE PROFILE OF ANTIBIOTIC PRESCRIPTIONS IN PEDIATRIC OUTPATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY","authors":"O. Horodnycha, A. Zimenkovsky","doi":"10.25040/ntsh2022.02.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Antimicrobial therapy is a common practice in pediatrics. \nAim. The main objective was to determine and characterize the profile of antibiotic prescriptions in pediatric outpatients. \nMethods. This was a retrospective observational study performed in two pharmacies in Lviv (October 2021). 113 written doctor’s prescriptions for outpatient children were collected. \nResults. Antibiotics were administered for 44.2% (95%CI 34.9%–53.9%) of patients. The main reasons for antibiotic prescriptions were acute tonsillitis (30.0%) and acute upper respiratory tract infections (26.0%). Macrolides, cephalosporins, penicillins, and sulfonamides with trimethoprim presented 40.0%, 36.0%, 20.0%, and 4.0% of antibiotic prescriptions, respectively. Antimicrobials from the Access group accounted for 26.0% of antibiotic prescriptions (instead of at least 60.0%, WHO) and antibiotics from the Watch group constituted 74.0% (instead of a maximum of 40.0%, WHO). Antibiotics were prescribed to 61.9% of outpatients with acute upper respiratory tract infections, 93.7% of patients with acute tonsillitis, and 45.5% – with otitis media instead of recommended 0-20% (ESAC-Net). The first-line antibiotics were used in 23.1% of cases of acute upper respiratory infections, 26.7% of cases of acute tonsillitis, and 40.0% of otitis media, which is below the acceptable range (80–100%, ESAC-Net). In total, 22 antibiotic-associated drug-related problems (DRPs) were found in 34.0% of written doctor’s prescriptions with antimicrobials. The most common were: (1) excessive length of therapy (36.4%) and (2) potential drug-drug interactions (31.8%). \nConclusions. The rate of antibiotic prescriptions for children is high and associated with different DRPs. The majority of antibiotic prescription quality indicators are outside the recommended ranges. Thus, effective interventions and campaigns to improve antibiotic therapy in children are needed.","PeriodicalId":345961,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25040/ntsh2022.02.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Antimicrobial therapy is a common practice in pediatrics. Aim. The main objective was to determine and characterize the profile of antibiotic prescriptions in pediatric outpatients. Methods. This was a retrospective observational study performed in two pharmacies in Lviv (October 2021). 113 written doctor’s prescriptions for outpatient children were collected. Results. Antibiotics were administered for 44.2% (95%CI 34.9%–53.9%) of patients. The main reasons for antibiotic prescriptions were acute tonsillitis (30.0%) and acute upper respiratory tract infections (26.0%). Macrolides, cephalosporins, penicillins, and sulfonamides with trimethoprim presented 40.0%, 36.0%, 20.0%, and 4.0% of antibiotic prescriptions, respectively. Antimicrobials from the Access group accounted for 26.0% of antibiotic prescriptions (instead of at least 60.0%, WHO) and antibiotics from the Watch group constituted 74.0% (instead of a maximum of 40.0%, WHO). Antibiotics were prescribed to 61.9% of outpatients with acute upper respiratory tract infections, 93.7% of patients with acute tonsillitis, and 45.5% – with otitis media instead of recommended 0-20% (ESAC-Net). The first-line antibiotics were used in 23.1% of cases of acute upper respiratory infections, 26.7% of cases of acute tonsillitis, and 40.0% of otitis media, which is below the acceptable range (80–100%, ESAC-Net). In total, 22 antibiotic-associated drug-related problems (DRPs) were found in 34.0% of written doctor’s prescriptions with antimicrobials. The most common were: (1) excessive length of therapy (36.4%) and (2) potential drug-drug interactions (31.8%). Conclusions. The rate of antibiotic prescriptions for children is high and associated with different DRPs. The majority of antibiotic prescription quality indicators are outside the recommended ranges. Thus, effective interventions and campaigns to improve antibiotic therapy in children are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科门诊患者抗生素处方概况:一项回顾性观察性研究
背景。抗菌治疗是儿科的一种常见做法。的目标。主要目的是确定和表征儿科门诊患者抗生素处方的概况。方法。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,在利沃夫的两家药店进行(2021年10月)。收集儿童门诊医师处方113张。结果。44.2% (95%CI 34.9% ~ 53.9%)的患者使用抗生素。抗生素处方的主要原因是急性扁桃体炎(30.0%)和急性上呼吸道感染(26.0%)。大环内酯类药物、头孢菌素类药物、青霉素类药物和磺胺类药物联合甲氧苄啶分别占抗生素处方的40.0%、36.0%、20.0%和4.0%。来自可及组的抗微生物药物占抗生素处方的26.0%(而不是世卫组织的至少60.0%),来自观察组的抗生素占74.0%(而不是世卫组织的最高40.0%)。61.9%的急性上呼吸道感染患者、93.7%的急性扁桃体炎患者和45.5%的中耳炎患者使用抗生素,而不是推荐的0-20% (ESAC-Net)。23.1%的急性上呼吸道感染病例、26.7%的急性扁桃体炎病例和40.0%的中耳炎病例使用一线抗生素,均低于可接受范围(80-100%,ESAC-Net)。总的来说,在34.0%的医生抗菌药物书面处方中发现了22个抗生素相关药物问题。最常见的是:(1)治疗时间过长(36.4%)和(2)潜在的药物相互作用(31.8%)。结论。儿童抗生素处方率很高,与不同的drp有关。大多数抗生素处方质量指标在推荐范围之外。因此,需要有效的干预措施和运动来改善儿童的抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GUT MICROBIOME IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME USING INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN A PATIENT WITH SEPTIC SHOCK AND MULTIPLE COMORBIDITIES: A REVIEW BASED ON A CLINICAL CASE MORAL AND ETHICAL COMPONENT OF SCIENCE IN TIMES OF WAR ADVANCES IN IMAGING FOR CLINICAL TRIALS IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES BOHDAN YEVHEN NADRAGА – A DOCTOR BY DESTINY’S CALLING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1