{"title":"Approximate Gomory–Hu tree is faster than n – 1 max-flows","authors":"Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi","doi":"10.1145/3406325.3451112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting s−t mincuts (and by duality, the values of s−t maxflows) for all pairs of vertices s and t in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using n−1 exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, even for approximate mincuts. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using log(n) maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in Õ(m + n3/2) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. Previously, the best running time known was Õ(n5/2), which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu’s original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in m4/3+o(1) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely m = o(n9/8). Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was Õ(mn) for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the (1+є)-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the s−t mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in Õ(n2) time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).","PeriodicalId":132752,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting s−t mincuts (and by duality, the values of s−t maxflows) for all pairs of vertices s and t in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using n−1 exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, even for approximate mincuts. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using log(n) maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in Õ(m + n3/2) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. Previously, the best running time known was Õ(n5/2), which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu’s original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in m4/3+o(1) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely m = o(n9/8). Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was Õ(mn) for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the (1+є)-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the s−t mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in Õ(n2) time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).