Difference between Artificial Intelligence of the Internet of Things and the Traditional Internet

Yong Zhu, Lang Liu
{"title":"Difference between Artificial Intelligence of the Internet of Things and the Traditional Internet","authors":"Yong Zhu, Lang Liu","doi":"10.23919/WAC55640.2022.9934002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the birth of the Internet to the present, research on the Internet has been going on. Especially development with the integration of new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), big data, and the Internet of Things (IoT), with the Internet, people are paying more and more attention to the Internet, and the research on the differences between the IoT AI and the traditional Internet is also becoming more and more intense. The purpose of this article is to study the difference between the AI of the IoT and the traditional Internet. This article first summarizes the differences between the IoT AI and the traditional Internet, and then designs the IoT AI architecture system based on the BP neural network, and gives a detailed description of each layer in the architecture. This article introduces the hardware and software environment for deploying the AI system architecture of the IoT, and verifies the usability of the proposed architecture through performance tests. Through the average response time test of the cloud computing layer deployed with single and dual server load balancing, the data shows that when the number of concurrent clients is 1, the single server response time is 18.4ms, and the dual server response time is 17.2ms. When the number is 900, the single server response time is 573.6ms, and the dual server response time is 237.7ms. It can be seen that as the number of concurrent threads increases, the response time of the server is also longer. Moreover, under the condition of equal concurrent threads, the response time of two servers is shorter than that of the cloud computing layer deployed by a single server.","PeriodicalId":339737,"journal":{"name":"2022 World Automation Congress (WAC)","volume":"17 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 World Automation Congress (WAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/WAC55640.2022.9934002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the birth of the Internet to the present, research on the Internet has been going on. Especially development with the integration of new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), big data, and the Internet of Things (IoT), with the Internet, people are paying more and more attention to the Internet, and the research on the differences between the IoT AI and the traditional Internet is also becoming more and more intense. The purpose of this article is to study the difference between the AI of the IoT and the traditional Internet. This article first summarizes the differences between the IoT AI and the traditional Internet, and then designs the IoT AI architecture system based on the BP neural network, and gives a detailed description of each layer in the architecture. This article introduces the hardware and software environment for deploying the AI system architecture of the IoT, and verifies the usability of the proposed architecture through performance tests. Through the average response time test of the cloud computing layer deployed with single and dual server load balancing, the data shows that when the number of concurrent clients is 1, the single server response time is 18.4ms, and the dual server response time is 17.2ms. When the number is 900, the single server response time is 573.6ms, and the dual server response time is 237.7ms. It can be seen that as the number of concurrent threads increases, the response time of the server is also longer. Moreover, under the condition of equal concurrent threads, the response time of two servers is shorter than that of the cloud computing layer deployed by a single server.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物联网人工智能与传统互联网的区别
从互联网诞生到现在,对互联网的研究一直在进行。特别是随着人工智能(AI)、大数据、物联网(IoT)等新技术的融合发展,随着互联网的发展,人们对互联网的关注越来越多,对物联网AI与传统互联网差异的研究也越来越激烈。本文的目的是研究物联网的人工智能与传统互联网的区别。本文首先总结了物联网AI与传统互联网的区别,然后设计了基于BP神经网络的物联网AI架构体系,并对架构中的各层进行了详细的描述。本文介绍了部署物联网AI系统架构的软硬件环境,并通过性能测试验证了所提架构的可用性。通过对单服务器和双服务器负载均衡部署的云计算层的平均响应时间测试,数据显示,当并发客户端数量为1时,单服务器响应时间为18.4ms,双服务器响应时间为17.2ms。当数量为900时,单服务器响应时间为573.6ms,双服务器响应时间为237.7ms。可以看出,随着并发线程数量的增加,服务器的响应时间也会变长。而且,在线程数相等的情况下,两台服务器的响应时间比单台服务器部署云计算层的响应时间要短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stability analysis of high slope based on MIDAS GTS digital simulation Research on Bridge Health Management Prediction System Based on deep learning Research on power technology and application architecture based on 5g message operation platform Algorithm modeling technology of computer aided fractal art pattern design Posture Estimation System for Excavator Manipulator Using Deep Learning and Inverse Kinematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1