Impact of a spinal cord injury in employment: a cross-sectional study in a Portuguese population

Inês Ferro, César Pires, Pedro C Sá, Xénia Verraest, Paulo Margalho, Filipe Carvalho, J. Laíns
{"title":"Impact of a spinal cord injury in employment: a cross-sectional study in a Portuguese population","authors":"Inês Ferro, César Pires, Pedro C Sá, Xénia Verraest, Paulo Margalho, Filipe Carvalho, J. Laíns","doi":"10.15406/ipmrj.2022.07.00294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients who have sustained a spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently face a fundamental change in their employment situation, as the demands of their previous job often exceed their remaining physical abilities. Aim: To study which factors associated with the SCI may influence the employment status. Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting and population: Seventy-three individuals who had sustained a SCI, admitted in our Rehabilitation Center in 2015. Intervention: Not applicable. Methods: Besides clinical information, a telephone questionnaire was applied in 2019 to the patients, in order to identify demographic and injury-related status, functionality (FIM, SCIM-III, nFAC scales), and work-related information. The data was analyzed in SPSS Statistics® version 26, using χ2 test for categorical variables and t test for independent samples between continuous and categorical variables. Results: The employment rate after SCI was 27.8%. The need of a caregiver showed a significant relationship with not being employed (p<0.001), consisting in an independent determinant for employment (OR 5.38). Return-to-work was associated with higher functional scores, lower mean age values (p<0.001), previous higher education level (p<0.001), and pre-injury intellectual job (p=0.009). Conclusion and clinical rehabilitation impact: The employment rate and factors influencing return-to-work were in line with those available in literature. Additionally, we consider that the “need of a caregiver” is essential in the evaluation of a SCI patient, as it gives a clearer understanding of the patients’ work ability (participation domain), in contrast with functional scores, best suited in the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health.","PeriodicalId":336722,"journal":{"name":"International Physical Medicine &amp; Rehabilitation Journal","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Physical Medicine &amp; Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ipmrj.2022.07.00294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients who have sustained a spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently face a fundamental change in their employment situation, as the demands of their previous job often exceed their remaining physical abilities. Aim: To study which factors associated with the SCI may influence the employment status. Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting and population: Seventy-three individuals who had sustained a SCI, admitted in our Rehabilitation Center in 2015. Intervention: Not applicable. Methods: Besides clinical information, a telephone questionnaire was applied in 2019 to the patients, in order to identify demographic and injury-related status, functionality (FIM, SCIM-III, nFAC scales), and work-related information. The data was analyzed in SPSS Statistics® version 26, using χ2 test for categorical variables and t test for independent samples between continuous and categorical variables. Results: The employment rate after SCI was 27.8%. The need of a caregiver showed a significant relationship with not being employed (p<0.001), consisting in an independent determinant for employment (OR 5.38). Return-to-work was associated with higher functional scores, lower mean age values (p<0.001), previous higher education level (p<0.001), and pre-injury intellectual job (p=0.009). Conclusion and clinical rehabilitation impact: The employment rate and factors influencing return-to-work were in line with those available in literature. Additionally, we consider that the “need of a caregiver” is essential in the evaluation of a SCI patient, as it gives a clearer understanding of the patients’ work ability (participation domain), in contrast with functional scores, best suited in the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤对就业的影响:葡萄牙人口的横断面研究
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者经常面临就业状况的根本变化,因为他们以前工作的需求往往超过了他们剩余的身体能力。目的:探讨与脊髓损伤相关的因素对就业状况的影响。设计:描述性横断面研究。环境和人群:2015年,我们的康复中心收治了73名脊髓损伤患者。干预:不适用。方法:除临床资料外,于2019年对患者进行电话问卷调查,以确定人口统计学和损伤相关状态、功能(FIM、sim - iii、nFAC量表)和工作相关信息。使用SPSS Statistics®version 26对数据进行分析,分类变量采用χ2检验,连续变量与分类变量之间的独立样本采用t检验。结果:SCI术后的就业率为27.8%。需要照顾者与未就业有显著关系(p<0.001),构成就业的独立决定因素(OR 5.38)。重返工作岗位与较高的功能评分、较低的平均年龄值(p<0.001)、以前的高等教育水平(p<0.001)和损伤前的智力工作(p=0.009)相关。结论及临床康复效果:患者就业率及影响复工的因素与文献相符。此外,我们认为“照顾者的需要”在评估脊髓损伤患者时是必不可少的,因为与功能评分相比,它能更清楚地了解患者的工作能力(参与领域),而功能评分最适合国际功能残疾与健康分类的活动领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes of running with FAST and contour stimulation in the spinal cord stimulation therapy trial only in Japan Anatomophysiological repercussions of the electronic cigarette with emphasis on the respiratory and nervous systems: a narrative review Outcomes of ECAP-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation therapy in JAPAN: how to increase patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation Management of obesity and other metabolic disorders through faecal microbiota transplant technology Therapeutic electric currents in the treatment of cervicalgy: integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1