Framework and Case Studies

P. D. Anderson, M. Dourson, J. Unrine, J. Sheeshka, E. Murkin, Jerry Stober
{"title":"Framework and Case Studies","authors":"P. D. Anderson, M. Dourson, J. Unrine, J. Sheeshka, E. Murkin, Jerry Stober","doi":"10.1080/08865140215066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an initial Comparative Dietary Risk Framework (referred to as the framework) that combines and compares the potential benefits and potential risks associated with eating contaminated fish. The results of this framework are preliminary, due to the multifactorial analysis involved. Thus, while the framework is a quantitative representation of the net risk (or benefit) associated with eating contaminated fish, it should be used to inform public health officials about the benefits and risk of eating contaminated fish and to investigate and compare various alternative fish protein sources, including perhaps other","PeriodicalId":402874,"journal":{"name":"Comments on Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comments on Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865140215066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This article presents an initial Comparative Dietary Risk Framework (referred to as the framework) that combines and compares the potential benefits and potential risks associated with eating contaminated fish. The results of this framework are preliminary, due to the multifactorial analysis involved. Thus, while the framework is a quantitative representation of the net risk (or benefit) associated with eating contaminated fish, it should be used to inform public health officials about the benefits and risk of eating contaminated fish and to investigate and compare various alternative fish protein sources, including perhaps other
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
架构及个案研究
本文提出了一个初步的比较饮食风险框架(简称框架),结合并比较了食用受污染鱼类的潜在利益和潜在风险。由于涉及多因素分析,该框架的结果是初步的。因此,虽然该框架是与食用受污染鱼类相关的净风险(或收益)的定量表示,但它应用于向公共卫生官员通报食用受污染鱼类的收益和风险,并调查和比较各种替代鱼类蛋白质来源,可能包括其他来源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview: Biomarkers of Pollution in Aquatic Animals Current and Future Perspectives Using Biomarkers to Assess Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems Global Analysis of Biomarker Responses in Aquatic Organisms Exposed to Contaminants Total Oxyradical Scavenging Capacity as an Index of Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress in Marine Organisms Annelids and Nematodes as Sentinels of Environmental Pollution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1