Perception and Satisfaction of Free Foodservice in Male Middle School Students in Chungnam

Yu-Rin Kim, Eun‐Jin Kim, Mi-Kyeong Choi
{"title":"Perception and Satisfaction of Free Foodservice in Male Middle School Students in Chungnam","authors":"Yu-Rin Kim, Eun‐Jin Kim, Mi-Kyeong Choi","doi":"10.14373/JKDA.2014.20.2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to investigate perception, necessity, and satisfaction of a free foodservice in male middle school students. This study was conducted at male middle schools with paid foodservice (PFS group, 250 students) and with free foodservice (FFS group, 250 students) in Chungnam. Average age of stu-dents in the PFS group was 13.1 while that of FFS students was 12.8 years. Exactly 88% of PFS students and 94% of FFS students responded that school foodservice is necessary, which was a significant difference (P<0.05). As the reason for participating in foodservice, about 32% of the PFS students answered the school’s request while 33.6% of FFS students answered nutrition, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). Exactly 72.8% of PFS and 96.4% of FFS knew about FFS (P<0.001). More PFS students (86.4%) than FFS students (66%) answered they would not participate in foodservice if the FFS would be introduced and the quality of meal service would deteriorate. After initiation to FFS, there were significant differences in assess-ment of foodservice: 77.6% of PFS students answered expected that the quality of foodservice would degrade, whereas 74.4% of FFS students answered that quality would not degrade (P<0.001). Satisfaction of foodser-vice was 2.3 points for FFS students, which was significantly lower than the 2.5 points for PFS students (P<0.001). To sum up assessment of foodservice was positive, whereas satisfaction was not significantly differ-ent between PFS and FFS. Based on this research, households, schools, and governments should promote FFS in order to diminish financial pressure for students.","PeriodicalId":438121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2014.20.2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to investigate perception, necessity, and satisfaction of a free foodservice in male middle school students. This study was conducted at male middle schools with paid foodservice (PFS group, 250 students) and with free foodservice (FFS group, 250 students) in Chungnam. Average age of stu-dents in the PFS group was 13.1 while that of FFS students was 12.8 years. Exactly 88% of PFS students and 94% of FFS students responded that school foodservice is necessary, which was a significant difference (P<0.05). As the reason for participating in foodservice, about 32% of the PFS students answered the school’s request while 33.6% of FFS students answered nutrition, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). Exactly 72.8% of PFS and 96.4% of FFS knew about FFS (P<0.001). More PFS students (86.4%) than FFS students (66%) answered they would not participate in foodservice if the FFS would be introduced and the quality of meal service would deteriorate. After initiation to FFS, there were significant differences in assess-ment of foodservice: 77.6% of PFS students answered expected that the quality of foodservice would degrade, whereas 74.4% of FFS students answered that quality would not degrade (P<0.001). Satisfaction of foodser-vice was 2.3 points for FFS students, which was significantly lower than the 2.5 points for PFS students (P<0.001). To sum up assessment of foodservice was positive, whereas satisfaction was not significantly differ-ent between PFS and FFS. Based on this research, households, schools, and governments should promote FFS in order to diminish financial pressure for students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
忠南地区男中学生对免费餐饮服务的感知与满意度
摘要本研究旨在探讨男中学生对免费餐饮服务的感知、必要性及满意度。本研究以忠南地区收费供餐男中学(PFS组,250名学生)和免费供餐男中学(FFS组,250名学生)为研究对象。PFS组学生平均年龄为13.1岁,FFS组学生平均年龄为12.8岁。88%的PFS学生和94%的FFS学生回答学校餐饮服务是必要的,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。作为参与餐饮服务的原因,PFS学生约32%回答了学校的要求,而FFS学生回答营养的比例为33.6%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。72.8%的PFS和96.4%的FFS知道FFS (P<0.001)。PFS学生(86.4%)比FFS学生(66%)回答说,如果引入FFS,餐饮服务质量会下降,他们不会参加餐饮服务。进入FFS后,对餐饮服务的评估存在显著差异:77.6%的PFS学生回答预计餐饮服务质量会下降,而74.4%的FFS学生回答质量不会下降(P<0.001)。FFS学生的餐饮服务满意度为2.3分,显著低于PFS学生的2.5分(P<0.001)。综上所述,对餐饮服务的评价是积极的,而满意度在PFS和FFS之间没有显著差异。根据这项研究,家庭、学校和政府应该推广FFS,以减轻学生的经济压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying the Causes of Nutrition Inadequacy in Vietnamese Married Immigrant Women and Korean Spouses through Qualitative Research Factors Related to the Self-Rated Health Status among Korean Elderly: Analysis of the 2016 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Study on the Relationship between the Nutrient Intake and Level of Depressive Symptoms: Using the Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016 Level of Nutrition Knowledge, Diet Practice and Education Demands in Dialysis Patients with Chronic Renal Failure Depression and Related Risk Factors in the Elderly with a Focused on Health Habits, Mental Health, Chronic Diseases, and Nutrient Intake Status: Data from the 2014 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1