A Comparison Between Two Approaches to Optimize Weights of Connections in Artificial Neural Networks

Aydin Teymourifar
{"title":"A Comparison Between Two Approaches to Optimize Weights of Connections in Artificial Neural Networks","authors":"Aydin Teymourifar","doi":"10.13189/ujam.2021.090201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used for estimation in numerous areas. Raising the accuracy of ANNs is always one of the important challenges, which is generally defined as a non-linear optimization problem. The aim of this optimization is to find better values for the weights of the connections and biases in ANN because they seriously affect the efficiency. This study uses two approaches to do such optimization in an ANN. For this aim, we create a feed-forward backpropagation ANN using the functions of MATLAB's deep learning toolbox. To improve its accuracy, in the first approach, we use the Levenberg - Marquardt algorithm (LMA) for training, which is available in MATLAB's deep learning toolbox. In the second approach, we optimize the values of weights and biases of ANN with Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), available in MATLAB's global optimization toolbox. Then, we assess the accuracy of estimation for the trained ANNs. In this way, for the first time in the literature, we compare these methods for the optimization of an ANN. The used data sets are also available in MATLAB. Based on the acquired results, in some data sets, training with LMA, and for some others training with PSO cause the best results, however, training with LMA is faster, significantly. Although the used approaches and the obtained conclusions are beneficial for researchers that work in this field, they have some limitations. For instance, since only the functions and data sets from MATLAB are used, it can only serve as an example for researchers.","PeriodicalId":372283,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics","volume":"18 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujam.2021.090201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used for estimation in numerous areas. Raising the accuracy of ANNs is always one of the important challenges, which is generally defined as a non-linear optimization problem. The aim of this optimization is to find better values for the weights of the connections and biases in ANN because they seriously affect the efficiency. This study uses two approaches to do such optimization in an ANN. For this aim, we create a feed-forward backpropagation ANN using the functions of MATLAB's deep learning toolbox. To improve its accuracy, in the first approach, we use the Levenberg - Marquardt algorithm (LMA) for training, which is available in MATLAB's deep learning toolbox. In the second approach, we optimize the values of weights and biases of ANN with Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), available in MATLAB's global optimization toolbox. Then, we assess the accuracy of estimation for the trained ANNs. In this way, for the first time in the literature, we compare these methods for the optimization of an ANN. The used data sets are also available in MATLAB. Based on the acquired results, in some data sets, training with LMA, and for some others training with PSO cause the best results, however, training with LMA is faster, significantly. Although the used approaches and the obtained conclusions are beneficial for researchers that work in this field, they have some limitations. For instance, since only the functions and data sets from MATLAB are used, it can only serve as an example for researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工神经网络中两种连接权优化方法的比较
人工神经网络(ANNs)已在许多领域用于估计。提高人工神经网络的精度一直是一个重要的挑战,它通常被定义为非线性优化问题。这种优化的目的是为神经网络中的连接和偏差的权重找到更好的值,因为它们严重影响效率。本研究使用两种方法在人工神经网络中进行这种优化。为此,我们使用MATLAB深度学习工具箱的功能创建了一个前馈反向传播ANN。为了提高其准确性,在第一种方法中,我们使用Levenberg - Marquardt算法(LMA)进行训练,该算法可在MATLAB的深度学习工具箱中使用。在第二种方法中,我们使用MATLAB全局优化工具箱中的遗传算法(GA)和粒子群优化(PSO)来优化人工神经网络的权重和偏置值。然后,我们对训练好的人工神经网络的估计精度进行了评估。通过这种方式,我们首次在文献中比较了这些方法对人工神经网络的优化。使用的数据集也可以在MATLAB中获得。根据获得的结果,在一些数据集中,使用LMA训练和使用PSO训练会产生最好的结果,但是,使用LMA训练速度更快,而且明显更快。虽然使用的方法和所得的结论对从事该领域工作的研究人员有益,但它们也有一些局限性。例如,由于只使用了MATLAB中的函数和数据集,因此只能作为研究人员的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling the Effects of Media Coverage on the COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics On Graph Representation of Bee's Dances On the Stability of Bayesian Bifurcated Autoregressive Process via Student-t Random Noise: Application and Simulation Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Agricultural Assets Pricing European Options Using Burr-XII Distribution: Simulations and Risk Neutral Density
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1