ModelDiff: testing-based DNN similarity comparison for model reuse detection

Yuanchun Li, Ziqi Zhang, Bingyan Liu, Ziyue Yang, Yunxin Liu
{"title":"ModelDiff: testing-based DNN similarity comparison for model reuse detection","authors":"Yuanchun Li, Ziqi Zhang, Bingyan Liu, Ziyue Yang, Yunxin Liu","doi":"10.1145/3460319.3464816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knowledge of a deep learning model may be transferred to a student model, leading to intellectual property infringement or vulnerability propagation. Detecting such knowledge reuse is nontrivial because the suspect models may not be white-box accessible and/or may serve different tasks. In this paper, we propose ModelDiff, a testing-based approach to deep learning model similarity comparison. Instead of directly comparing the weights, activations, or outputs of two models, we compare their behavioral patterns on the same set of test inputs. Specifically, the behavioral pattern of a model is represented as a decision distance vector (DDV), in which each element is the distance between the model's reactions to a pair of inputs. The knowledge similarity between two models is measured with the cosine similarity between their DDVs. To evaluate ModelDiff, we created a benchmark that contains 144 pairs of models that cover most popular model reuse methods, including transfer learning, model compression, and model stealing. Our method achieved 91.7% correctness on the benchmark, which demonstrates the effectiveness of using ModelDiff for model reuse detection. A study on mobile deep learning apps has shown the feasibility of ModelDiff on real-world models.","PeriodicalId":188008,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis","volume":"25 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3460319.3464816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The knowledge of a deep learning model may be transferred to a student model, leading to intellectual property infringement or vulnerability propagation. Detecting such knowledge reuse is nontrivial because the suspect models may not be white-box accessible and/or may serve different tasks. In this paper, we propose ModelDiff, a testing-based approach to deep learning model similarity comparison. Instead of directly comparing the weights, activations, or outputs of two models, we compare their behavioral patterns on the same set of test inputs. Specifically, the behavioral pattern of a model is represented as a decision distance vector (DDV), in which each element is the distance between the model's reactions to a pair of inputs. The knowledge similarity between two models is measured with the cosine similarity between their DDVs. To evaluate ModelDiff, we created a benchmark that contains 144 pairs of models that cover most popular model reuse methods, including transfer learning, model compression, and model stealing. Our method achieved 91.7% correctness on the benchmark, which demonstrates the effectiveness of using ModelDiff for model reuse detection. A study on mobile deep learning apps has shown the feasibility of ModelDiff on real-world models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ModelDiff:基于测试的DNN相似度比较,用于模型重用检测
深度学习模型的知识可能被转移到学生模型中,导致知识产权侵权或漏洞传播。检测这样的知识重用是非常重要的,因为可疑模型可能不是白盒可访问的,并且/或者可能服务于不同的任务。在本文中,我们提出了ModelDiff,一种基于测试的深度学习模型相似性比较方法。我们不是直接比较两个模型的权重、激活或输出,而是在同一组测试输入上比较它们的行为模式。具体来说,模型的行为模式被表示为决策距离向量(DDV),其中每个元素是模型对一对输入的反应之间的距离。两个模型之间的知识相似度用它们的ddv之间的余弦相似度来度量。为了评估ModelDiff,我们创建了一个包含144对模型的基准,这些模型涵盖了最流行的模型重用方法,包括迁移学习、模型压缩和模型窃取。我们的方法在基准上达到了91.7%的正确率,证明了使用ModelDiff进行模型重用检测的有效性。一项针对移动深度学习应用的研究表明,ModelDiff在现实世界模型上是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semantic table structure identification in spreadsheets Parema: an unpacking framework for demystifying VM-based Android packers TERA: optimizing stochastic regression tests in machine learning projects Empirically evaluating readily available information for regression test optimization in continuous integration RESTest: automated black-box testing of RESTful web APIs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1