Equality and differences: group interaction in mixed focus groups of users and professionals discussing power

Ingrid Femdal, Marit Solbjør
{"title":"Equality and differences: group interaction in mixed focus groups of users and professionals discussing power","authors":"Ingrid Femdal, Marit Solbjør","doi":"10.1080/20021518.2018.1447193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using focus groups, the group interaction provide an important source of data about the group process. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals in mixed focus groups interact when discussing power in user-professional relationships. By analysing three mixed focus group discussions where both mental health service users and professionals participate, the article contributes to the discussion on focus group interaction in mixed focus groups. The analysis is inspired by Stevens’ twelve-question guide for group interaction. The results show how the participants related to the vignettes, how they related to each other, and contradictions and disagreements in the focus groups discussing the vignettes. Despite the participant’s background as users and professionals, the vignettes engaged the group discussions and became a tool for equality within the groups. By discussing power in user-professional relationships in mixed focus groups, the vignettes were interpreted from perspectives as user, mental health workers and researchers. Mixed focus group interaction can make a valuable contribution to developing knowledge in the field of mental health service research.","PeriodicalId":254363,"journal":{"name":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20021518.2018.1447193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using focus groups, the group interaction provide an important source of data about the group process. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals in mixed focus groups interact when discussing power in user-professional relationships. By analysing three mixed focus group discussions where both mental health service users and professionals participate, the article contributes to the discussion on focus group interaction in mixed focus groups. The analysis is inspired by Stevens’ twelve-question guide for group interaction. The results show how the participants related to the vignettes, how they related to each other, and contradictions and disagreements in the focus groups discussing the vignettes. Despite the participant’s background as users and professionals, the vignettes engaged the group discussions and became a tool for equality within the groups. By discussing power in user-professional relationships in mixed focus groups, the vignettes were interpreted from perspectives as user, mental health workers and researchers. Mixed focus group interaction can make a valuable contribution to developing knowledge in the field of mental health service research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平等与差异:用户和专业人员讨论权力的混合焦点小组中的小组互动
使用焦点小组,小组互动为小组过程提供了重要的数据来源。本研究的目的是探讨混合焦点小组中的用户和专业人员在讨论用户-专业关系中的权力时如何互动。本文通过分析三个由心理健康服务使用者和专业人员共同参与的混合焦点小组讨论,对混合焦点小组中的焦点小组互动进行了讨论。这一分析受到了史蒂文斯关于小组互动的12个问题指南的启发。结果显示了参与者如何与小插曲相关,他们如何相互关联,以及讨论小插曲的焦点小组中的矛盾和分歧。尽管参与者的背景是用户和专业人士,但小插曲参与了小组讨论,并成为小组内平等的工具。通过在混合焦点小组中讨论用户-专业关系中的权力,从用户、精神卫生工作者和研究人员的角度对小插曲进行了解释。混合焦点小组互动可以为精神卫生服务研究领域的知识发展做出宝贵贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dimensions of vulnerability salient for health: a sociological approach “Does training in Motivational Interviewing affect the ability to build working alliance? – an intervention study” Promoting professional development in medical education: perspectives from the Norwegian medical school in Tromsoe Co-worker dialogue – a tool for health, personal development, and an empowering development culture in the workplace Relationships between healthcare employees and managers as a resource for well-being at work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1