218 Let’s talk about rectus sheath catheters. A retrospective audit of analgesic techniques used in emergency laparotomy

J. Bordoni, S. Siew, C. Buffery, M. Goulden
{"title":"218 Let’s talk about rectus sheath catheters. A retrospective audit of analgesic techniques used in emergency laparotomy","authors":"J. Bordoni, S. Siew, C. Buffery, M. Goulden","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019656) following approval from Max Healthcare Ethics Committee. 80 adult female patients (ASA grades I&II) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive PECS block and ESP block with 30 ml of 0.375% Levobupivacaine, after induction of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was administered for postoperative pain relief via PCA pump. Outcomes such as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess pain, time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction etc. were statistically analysed. Results Patients given modified PECS block experienced significantly better quality of analgesia and perceived the block to be more satisfactory with respect to pain relief and ability to sleep (p < 0.001). With PECS block, patients showed significantly lower mean NRS scores at 24-hours postoperatively (1.18 ±1.13 vs 2.65 ±0.98)(p<0.001) and total fentanyl consumed was considerably lesser (61.25 ± 41.58 mcg vs 183.75 ± 51.13 mcg)(p<0.001). Conclusions We found that modified PECS block provided superior postoperative analgesia than ESP block in patients undergoing MRM without any adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":184382,"journal":{"name":"Postoperative pain management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postoperative pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019656) following approval from Max Healthcare Ethics Committee. 80 adult female patients (ASA grades I&II) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive PECS block and ESP block with 30 ml of 0.375% Levobupivacaine, after induction of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was administered for postoperative pain relief via PCA pump. Outcomes such as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess pain, time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction etc. were statistically analysed. Results Patients given modified PECS block experienced significantly better quality of analgesia and perceived the block to be more satisfactory with respect to pain relief and ability to sleep (p < 0.001). With PECS block, patients showed significantly lower mean NRS scores at 24-hours postoperatively (1.18 ±1.13 vs 2.65 ±0.98)(p<0.001) and total fentanyl consumed was considerably lesser (61.25 ± 41.58 mcg vs 183.75 ± 51.13 mcg)(p<0.001). Conclusions We found that modified PECS block provided superior postoperative analgesia than ESP block in patients undergoing MRM without any adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们来谈谈直肌鞘导管。急诊剖腹手术镇痛技术的回顾性分析
经Max Healthcare伦理委员会批准,印度注册中心(CTRI/2019/06/019656)将80例接受改良根治性乳房切除术的成年女性患者(ASA分级为i和ii级)随机分为两组,分别在麻醉诱导后使用0.375%左布比卡因30 ml进行PECS阻滞和ESP阻滞。芬太尼通过PCA泵缓解术后疼痛。统计分析疼痛评分、首次抢救镇痛时间、术中术后芬太尼用量、PONV发生率、患者满意度等结果。结果改良PECS阻滞的患者镇痛质量明显提高,疼痛缓解和睡眠能力更令人满意(p < 0.001)。PECS阻滞组患者术后24小时平均NRS评分显著降低(1.18±1.13 vs 2.65±0.98)(p<0.001),芬太尼总消耗显著降低(61.25±41.58 mcg vs 183.75±51.13 mcg)(p<0.001)。结论改良PECS阻滞在MRM患者术后镇痛效果优于ESP阻滞,且无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B339 Critical analysis and development of an acute pain management programme for postoperative recovery optimization B350 Efficacy and safety of different intrathecal morphine doses combined with spinal anaesthesia for hip replacement surgery B354 Comparison of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine over ultrasound guided rectus sheath block in laproscopic cholecystecomy: a pilot study B344 Comparison of the efficacy of transversalis fascia plane block and wound infiltration in varicocelectomy surgery: randomised controlled study B349 Effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic ivor-lewis oesophagectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1