"The Peasant Lady": an Existential Choice, Super-Difficult in Life, but Possible in Art

V. Rozin
{"title":"\"The Peasant Lady\": an Existential Choice, Super-Difficult in Life, but Possible in Art","authors":"V. Rozin","doi":"10.7256/2454-0625.2023.2.39727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article offers a new, in fact, cultural and psychological version of Pushkin's famous story \"The Peasant Lady\". Various assessments of this work are given, including the author's, teenage. The author argues that the modern understanding of works of art involves an analysis of the culture in which it was created, as well as the author of this work. Realizing this installation, he discusses why Pushkin shifted to the reader the consideration of the consequences that followed from the last scene of the \"Peasant Girl\", when the deception-Lisa's game was revealed. According to the author, this would destroy the plot, since it would show that the behavior of Lisa and Alexey contradicted the ideas of marriage and the actions of young people accepted in Russian society at that time.   It is hypothesized that Pushkin, composing \"The Peasant Lady\", solved his own existential problem, which P. Chaadaev pointed out to him, namely, his real life contradicted Pushkin's declared values and poems. Unable to rebuild his life in 1830, Alexander Sergeevich compromises, reconciling the real and desirable life in the field of art, this largely explains the peculiarities of the \"Peasant Lady\". In Marina Tsvetaeva's work, there was also the use of art (and other discourses) to bridge the gap between real and desired life, which to a certain extent allowed the artist to realize himself and preserve his mental health.\n","PeriodicalId":184304,"journal":{"name":"Культура и искусство","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Культура и искусство","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2023.2.39727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article offers a new, in fact, cultural and psychological version of Pushkin's famous story "The Peasant Lady". Various assessments of this work are given, including the author's, teenage. The author argues that the modern understanding of works of art involves an analysis of the culture in which it was created, as well as the author of this work. Realizing this installation, he discusses why Pushkin shifted to the reader the consideration of the consequences that followed from the last scene of the "Peasant Girl", when the deception-Lisa's game was revealed. According to the author, this would destroy the plot, since it would show that the behavior of Lisa and Alexey contradicted the ideas of marriage and the actions of young people accepted in Russian society at that time.   It is hypothesized that Pushkin, composing "The Peasant Lady", solved his own existential problem, which P. Chaadaev pointed out to him, namely, his real life contradicted Pushkin's declared values and poems. Unable to rebuild his life in 1830, Alexander Sergeevich compromises, reconciling the real and desirable life in the field of art, this largely explains the peculiarities of the "Peasant Lady". In Marina Tsvetaeva's work, there was also the use of art (and other discourses) to bridge the gap between real and desired life, which to a certain extent allowed the artist to realize himself and preserve his mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“农妇”:一种存在的选择,在生活中极为困难,但在艺术中却是可能的
本文提供了一个新的,事实上,文化和心理版本的普希金的著名故事“农妇”。对这部作品给出了各种各样的评价,包括作者的青少年评价。作者认为,对艺术作品的现代理解包括对其创作文化的分析,以及对作品作者的分析。意识到这个装置,他讨论了为什么普希金把“农家女孩”最后一幕的后果转移到读者身上,当欺骗丽莎的游戏被揭露时。根据作者的说法,这将破坏情节,因为这将表明丽莎和阿列克谢的行为与当时俄罗斯社会所接受的婚姻观念和年轻人的行为相矛盾。普希金在创作《农家夫人》时解决了自己的存在问题,恰达耶夫向他指出,他的现实生活与普希金所宣称的价值观和诗歌相矛盾。亚历山大·谢尔盖耶维奇在1830年无法重建自己的生活,他妥协了,在艺术领域调和了现实和理想的生活,这在很大程度上解释了“农妇”的特殊性。在Marina Tsvetaeva的作品中,也有使用艺术(和其他话语)来弥合现实生活与理想生活之间的差距,这在一定程度上使艺术家实现了自我并保持了心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Figures “Representing the Kingdoms, Grand Principalities, and Other Regions and Provinces of the Russian Empire, with Their Coats Of Arms”: Personifications of Territories in 18th-century Russian Art The visual content of neural networks as a return to the third-order simulacrum Vocal and arranging solutions for broadcasting Kuban Cossack folk songs: methodology and practice The visual content of neural networks as a return to the third-order simulacrum Vocal and arranging solutions for broadcasting Kuban Cossack folk songs: methodology and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1