Comparative analysis of multitouch interactive surfaces

Przemysław Kucharski, Dawid Sielski, K. Grudzień, Wiktor Kozakiewicz, Michal Basiuras, Klaudia Greif, Jakub Santorek, L. Babout
{"title":"Comparative analysis of multitouch interactive surfaces","authors":"Przemysław Kucharski, Dawid Sielski, K. Grudzień, Wiktor Kozakiewicz, Michal Basiuras, Klaudia Greif, Jakub Santorek, L. Babout","doi":"10.15439/2017F393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper is to compare two different modality multi-touch interactive surfaces based on both: user experience and results of measurements in order to examine how different properties influence usefulness, in specific, their fitness to act as a “coffee table”. Tests were conducted on the Microsoft PixelSense (AKA Surface) and a Samsung touch screen overlay both 40+ inches diagonally. The study covers analysis of obtained measurements and summary of user experience collected over a number of summits and experiments. While tests for both devices returned very similar results, with the overlay more favorable, neither device could truly fit the tested use case due to their inconvenience, form factor and other issues.","PeriodicalId":402724,"journal":{"name":"2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The subject of this paper is to compare two different modality multi-touch interactive surfaces based on both: user experience and results of measurements in order to examine how different properties influence usefulness, in specific, their fitness to act as a “coffee table”. Tests were conducted on the Microsoft PixelSense (AKA Surface) and a Samsung touch screen overlay both 40+ inches diagonally. The study covers analysis of obtained measurements and summary of user experience collected over a number of summits and experiments. While tests for both devices returned very similar results, with the overlay more favorable, neither device could truly fit the tested use case due to their inconvenience, form factor and other issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多点触控交互界面的对比分析
本文的主题是基于用户体验和测量结果来比较两种不同模态的多点触摸交互表面,以检查不同的属性如何影响有用性,具体来说,它们是否适合充当“咖啡桌”。在微软PixelSense(又名Surface)和三星触摸屏上进行了测试,两者对角线均超过40英寸。该研究包括对获得的测量结果的分析,以及对通过一系列峰会和实验收集的用户体验的总结。虽然对这两款设备的测试结果非常相似,但由于它们的不便、外形和其他问题,这两款设备都不能真正适合测试用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Process-oriented approach to competency management using ontologies Top k recommendations using contextual conditional preferences model Using classification for cost reduction of applying mutation testing An algorithm for Gaussian recursive filters in a multicore architecture A database performance polynomial multiple regression model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1