Comparison of modelled reynolds stresses for mild separation using RANS, DES and DDES schemes

N. Durrani
{"title":"Comparison of modelled reynolds stresses for mild separation using RANS, DES and DDES schemes","authors":"N. Durrani","doi":"10.1109/IBCAST.2012.6177559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study is focused to evaluate the accuracy of the Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES), Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulation (DDES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for a mild separation case. An in-house code dynamic grid detached eddy simulation `DG-DES' is used. The modeled turbulent Reynolds stresses are computed as a reference quantity. The flow around Aerospatiale A-airfoil at maximum lift with angle of attack α=13.3° and at a Reynolds number of 2× 106 is taken as the test case. The detailed experimental data for this case is available in the open literature. The computed turbulent Reynolds stresses from DES are lower than RANS within the boundary layer at the leading edge of the suction side. It is argued to be due to the premature switching to less dissipative LES mode within boundary layer. The DDES gives comparable values to RANS, as an expected outcome. It is observed that for the cases with the mild separation, although DDES works in correct fashion in line with the basic concept of treating the whole of the boundary layer in RANS mode. However, the original DES may perform better than the DDES due to lower dissipation characteristics. The DES results on the suction side in the wake-region are encouraging and comparatively better than DDES, despite its switching problem.","PeriodicalId":251584,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2012 9th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2012 9th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBCAST.2012.6177559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study is focused to evaluate the accuracy of the Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES), Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulation (DDES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for a mild separation case. An in-house code dynamic grid detached eddy simulation `DG-DES' is used. The modeled turbulent Reynolds stresses are computed as a reference quantity. The flow around Aerospatiale A-airfoil at maximum lift with angle of attack α=13.3° and at a Reynolds number of 2× 106 is taken as the test case. The detailed experimental data for this case is available in the open literature. The computed turbulent Reynolds stresses from DES are lower than RANS within the boundary layer at the leading edge of the suction side. It is argued to be due to the premature switching to less dissipative LES mode within boundary layer. The DDES gives comparable values to RANS, as an expected outcome. It is observed that for the cases with the mild separation, although DDES works in correct fashion in line with the basic concept of treating the whole of the boundary layer in RANS mode. However, the original DES may perform better than the DDES due to lower dissipation characteristics. The DES results on the suction side in the wake-region are encouraging and comparatively better than DDES, despite its switching problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用RANS、DES和DDES方案模拟轻度分离的雷诺数应力比较
本文主要研究了在轻度分离情况下,分离涡模拟(DES)、延迟分离涡模拟(DDES)和Reynolds平均Navier-Stokes (RANS)方程的准确性。使用内部代码动态网格分离涡流模拟' DG-DES'。模拟的湍流雷诺应力作为参考量计算。以航空航天a型在最大升力、迎角为α=13.3°、雷诺数为2× 106时的绕流为试验用例。该病例的详细实验数据可在公开文献中找到。在吸力侧前缘的边界层内,用DES计算得到的湍流雷诺应力低于RANS。认为这是由于在边界层内过早地切换到耗散较小的LES模式所致。作为预期的结果,DDES给出了与RANS相当的值。观察到,对于轻度分离的情况,虽然DDES的工作方式是正确的,但符合在RANS模式下处理整个边界层的基本概念。但是,由于耗散特性较低,原始DES可能比DDES性能更好。尽管存在切换问题,但在尾迹区吸力侧的DES结果令人鼓舞,并且相对优于DDES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive control of a quadrotor with unknown model parameters INDOOR POSITIONING SYSTEM using ultrasonics Klopfenstein tapered 2–18 GHz microstrip balun Modeling of shallow water sea ambient noise using artificial neural network Parametric study of sweeping corrugated wing and role of spanwise flow in delayed stall
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1