The Transformation of Tajikistan’s Religious Field: From Religious Pluralism to Authoritarian Inertia

Shahnoza Nozimova, Tim Epkenhans
{"title":"The Transformation of Tajikistan’s Religious Field: From Religious Pluralism to Authoritarian Inertia","authors":"Shahnoza Nozimova, Tim Epkenhans","doi":"10.1163/22142290-00602004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent transformation of Tajikistan’s political system has significantly altered the social and political context in which the country’s lay Muslims and religious elites negotiate Islam and Islamic normativity. The quasi-governmental Islamic Center (Markazi Islomi) has taken on a more dominant role, becoming the sole official (state-approved) Islamic institution in Tajikistan defining Islamic normativity. In this work, we explore the rationale behind the Tajik state’s pursuit of this political trajectory, conduct a detailed examination of the religious edicts ( fatwas) issued by the Islamic Center, and identify its conservative trends. Our research suggests that the Islamic Center offers the Tajik government a way to achieve its much-desired monopoly over the religious field. Furthermore, we argue that the Islamic Center’s conservative interpretation of Islam, with its emphasis on political conformity, social patriarchy, and limited mystical experience, is far more “legible” and administratively manageable for the authoritarian regime than the previous religious pluralism.","PeriodicalId":351033,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Affairs","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22142290-00602004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The recent transformation of Tajikistan’s political system has significantly altered the social and political context in which the country’s lay Muslims and religious elites negotiate Islam and Islamic normativity. The quasi-governmental Islamic Center (Markazi Islomi) has taken on a more dominant role, becoming the sole official (state-approved) Islamic institution in Tajikistan defining Islamic normativity. In this work, we explore the rationale behind the Tajik state’s pursuit of this political trajectory, conduct a detailed examination of the religious edicts ( fatwas) issued by the Islamic Center, and identify its conservative trends. Our research suggests that the Islamic Center offers the Tajik government a way to achieve its much-desired monopoly over the religious field. Furthermore, we argue that the Islamic Center’s conservative interpretation of Islam, with its emphasis on political conformity, social patriarchy, and limited mystical experience, is far more “legible” and administratively manageable for the authoritarian regime than the previous religious pluralism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔吉克斯坦宗教领域的转型:从宗教多元化到威权惯性
塔吉克斯坦最近的政治体制转型极大地改变了该国的世俗穆斯林和宗教精英就伊斯兰教和伊斯兰规范进行谈判的社会和政治环境。半官方的伊斯兰中心(Markazi Islomi)已经发挥了更大的主导作用,成为塔吉克斯坦唯一的官方(国家批准的)伊斯兰机构,定义伊斯兰规范。在这项工作中,我们探讨了塔吉克国家追求这一政治轨迹背后的理由,对伊斯兰中心发布的宗教法令(fatwas)进行了详细的审查,并确定了其保守趋势。我们的研究表明,伊斯兰中心为塔吉克政府提供了一种实现其对宗教领域渴望已久的垄断的途径。此外,我们认为伊斯兰中心对伊斯兰教的保守解释,强调政治一致性、社会父权制和有限的神秘经验,比以前的宗教多元主义更“清晰”,在行政上更易于管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Central Asian International Relations in Decolonial Age Maize-farming Forever? Is the New Path a Modified Old Path? Decolonising Actors and Vocabulary in International Relations of Central Asia Decolonial Central Asia, or a Post-liberal One?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1