Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: association with vaginal sponge use.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1992-09-01
M B Mengel, A B Davis
{"title":"Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: association with vaginal sponge use.","authors":"M B Mengel,&nbsp;A B Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A hypothesis-generation study was conducted to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences among women participating in a randomized controlled trial of male sexual partner treatment. Of the 140 women enrolled in the trial, 72 had a normal vaginal gram-stained slide at the first follow-up visit and were included in this analysis. Nineteen of the 72 (26.2%) women developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence documented by a vaginal gram-stained slide during the 6-week follow-up period. Of the 19 women, 4 of 6 sponge users (66%) developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence (RR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.43-6.02). Logistic regression analysis supported the association between sponge use and bacterial vaginosis recurrences (adjusted RR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.06-6.99) but revealed that an apparent protective effect of diaphragm use was due to the confounding effect of sexual partner treatment. Our hypothesis is that bacterial vaginosis recurrences may be due to factors other than sexual transmission, such as sponge use. Further studies are needed to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences. In the interim, physicians might suggest another form of contraception to their sponge-using patient with frequent bacterial vaginosis infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"12 3","pages":"283-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A hypothesis-generation study was conducted to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences among women participating in a randomized controlled trial of male sexual partner treatment. Of the 140 women enrolled in the trial, 72 had a normal vaginal gram-stained slide at the first follow-up visit and were included in this analysis. Nineteen of the 72 (26.2%) women developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence documented by a vaginal gram-stained slide during the 6-week follow-up period. Of the 19 women, 4 of 6 sponge users (66%) developed a bacterial vaginosis recurrence (RR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.43-6.02). Logistic regression analysis supported the association between sponge use and bacterial vaginosis recurrences (adjusted RR 2.71, 95% CI: 1.06-6.99) but revealed that an apparent protective effect of diaphragm use was due to the confounding effect of sexual partner treatment. Our hypothesis is that bacterial vaginosis recurrences may be due to factors other than sexual transmission, such as sponge use. Further studies are needed to examine risk factors for bacterial vaginosis recurrences. In the interim, physicians might suggest another form of contraception to their sponge-using patient with frequent bacterial vaginosis infections.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性细菌性阴道病:与阴道海绵的使用有关。
进行了一项假设生成研究,以检查参与男性性伴侣治疗的随机对照试验的女性细菌性阴道病复发的危险因素。在参加试验的140名妇女中,72名在第一次随访时阴道革兰氏染色玻片正常,并被纳入本分析。在6周的随访期间,72名女性中有19名(26.2%)出现阴道革兰氏染色玻片记录的细菌性阴道病复发。在19名女性中,6名海绵使用者中有4名(66%)发生细菌性阴道病复发(RR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.43-6.02)。Logistic回归分析支持海绵使用与细菌性阴道病复发之间的关联(调整后的RR为2.71,95% CI为1.06-6.99),但显示使用隔膜的明显保护作用是由于性伴侣治疗的混杂效应。我们的假设是细菌性阴道病的复发可能是由于性传播以外的因素,如使用海绵。需要进一步研究细菌性阴道病复发的危险因素。在此期间,医生可能会建议经常使用海绵的细菌性阴道病患者采用另一种避孕方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of survey research. Desirable features of qualitative research. Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents. Reliability of survey about immunization barriers in Minnesota. Should primary care physicians take care of diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1