Words matter: automatic detection of teacher questions in live classroom discourse using linguistics, acoustics, and context

P. Donnelly, Nathaniel Blanchard, A. Olney, Sean Kelly, M. Nystrand, S. D’Mello
{"title":"Words matter: automatic detection of teacher questions in live classroom discourse using linguistics, acoustics, and context","authors":"P. Donnelly, Nathaniel Blanchard, A. Olney, Sean Kelly, M. Nystrand, S. D’Mello","doi":"10.1145/3027385.3027417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate automatic detection of teacher questions from audio recordings collected in live classrooms with the goal of providing automated feedback to teachers. Using a dataset of audio recordings from 11 teachers across 37 class sessions, we automatically segment the audio into individual teacher utterances and code each as containing a question or not. We train supervised machine learning models to detect the human-coded questions using high-level linguistic features extracted from automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts, acoustic and prosodic features from the audio recordings, as well as context features, such as timing and turn-taking dynamics. Models are trained and validated independently of the teacher to ensure generalization to new teachers. We are able to distinguish questions and non-questions with a weighted F1 score of 0.69. A comparison of the three feature sets indicates that a model using linguistic features outperforms those using acoustic-prosodic and context features for question detection, but the combination of features yields a 5% improvement in overall accuracy compared to linguistic features alone. We discuss applications for pedagogical research, teacher formative assessment, and teacher professional development.","PeriodicalId":160897,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

We investigate automatic detection of teacher questions from audio recordings collected in live classrooms with the goal of providing automated feedback to teachers. Using a dataset of audio recordings from 11 teachers across 37 class sessions, we automatically segment the audio into individual teacher utterances and code each as containing a question or not. We train supervised machine learning models to detect the human-coded questions using high-level linguistic features extracted from automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts, acoustic and prosodic features from the audio recordings, as well as context features, such as timing and turn-taking dynamics. Models are trained and validated independently of the teacher to ensure generalization to new teachers. We are able to distinguish questions and non-questions with a weighted F1 score of 0.69. A comparison of the three feature sets indicates that a model using linguistic features outperforms those using acoustic-prosodic and context features for question detection, but the combination of features yields a 5% improvement in overall accuracy compared to linguistic features alone. We discuss applications for pedagogical research, teacher formative assessment, and teacher professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词语问题:使用语言学、声学和语境在课堂话语中自动检测教师问题
我们研究了从现场教室中收集的录音中自动检测教师问题的方法,目的是为教师提供自动反馈。使用11位教师在37节课上的录音数据集,我们自动将音频分割成单个教师的话语,并将每个声音编码为包含问题或不包含问题。我们训练有监督的机器学习模型,使用从自动语音识别(ASR)转录本中提取的高级语言特征、录音中的声学和韵律特征以及上下文特征(如定时和轮流动力学)来检测人类编码的问题。模型的训练和验证独立于教师,以确保推广到新教师。我们能够区分问题和非问题,加权F1得分为0.69。对三个特征集的比较表明,使用语言特征的模型在问题检测方面优于使用声学韵律和上下文特征的模型,但与单独使用语言特征相比,特征组合的整体准确性提高了5%。我们讨论了在教学研究、教师形成性评估和教师专业发展方面的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An information policy perspective on learning analytics When learning is high stake How can we accelerate dissemination of knowledge and learning?: developing an online knowledge management platform for networked improvement communities LAK17 hackathon: getting the right information to the right people so they can take the right action Strategies for data and learning analytics informed national education policies: the case of Uruguay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1