A Holistic Overview of Software Engineering Research Strategies

Klaas-Jan Stol, Brian Fitzgerald
{"title":"A Holistic Overview of Software Engineering Research Strategies","authors":"Klaas-Jan Stol, Brian Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1109/CESI.2015.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical research studies are the principal mechanism through which the software engineering research community studies and learns from software engineering practice. The focus on empirical studies has increased significantly in the past decade, more or less coinciding with the emergence of evidence-based software engineering, an idea that was proposed in 2004. As a consequence, the software engineering community is familiar with a range of empirical methods. However, while several overviews exist of popular empirical research methods, such as case studies and experiments, we lack a 'holistic' view of a more complete spectrum of research methods. Furthermore, while researchers will readily accept that all methods have inherent limitations, methods such as case study are still frequently critiqued for the lack of control that a researcher can exert in such a study, their use of qualitative data, and the limited generalizability that can be achieved. Controlled experiments are seen by many as yielding stronger evidence than case studies, but these can also be criticized due to the limited realism of the context in which they are conducted. We identify a holistic set of research methods and indicate their strengths and weaknesses in relation to various research elements.","PeriodicalId":222668,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CESI.2015.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Empirical research studies are the principal mechanism through which the software engineering research community studies and learns from software engineering practice. The focus on empirical studies has increased significantly in the past decade, more or less coinciding with the emergence of evidence-based software engineering, an idea that was proposed in 2004. As a consequence, the software engineering community is familiar with a range of empirical methods. However, while several overviews exist of popular empirical research methods, such as case studies and experiments, we lack a 'holistic' view of a more complete spectrum of research methods. Furthermore, while researchers will readily accept that all methods have inherent limitations, methods such as case study are still frequently critiqued for the lack of control that a researcher can exert in such a study, their use of qualitative data, and the limited generalizability that can be achieved. Controlled experiments are seen by many as yielding stronger evidence than case studies, but these can also be criticized due to the limited realism of the context in which they are conducted. We identify a holistic set of research methods and indicate their strengths and weaknesses in relation to various research elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件工程研究策略的整体概述
实证研究是软件工程研究界从软件工程实践中学习和学习的主要机制。对实证研究的关注在过去十年中显著增加,或多或少与2004年提出的基于证据的软件工程的出现相一致。因此,软件工程社区熟悉一系列经验方法。然而,虽然存在一些流行的实证研究方法的概述,例如案例研究和实验,但我们缺乏对更完整的研究方法的“整体”观点。此外,虽然研究人员很容易接受所有方法都有固有的局限性,但案例研究等方法仍然经常受到批评,因为研究人员在这样的研究中缺乏控制,使用定性数据,以及可以实现的有限的概括性。对照实验被许多人视为比案例研究产生更有力的证据,但由于它们所进行的背景的有限现实性,这些实验也可能受到批评。我们确定了一套整体的研究方法,并指出了他们的长处和弱点,与各种研究要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficulty Factors of Obtaining Access for Empirical Studies in Industry I'll Tell You What I Want, What I Really, Really Want: An Industry Perspective on the Effective Application of Research in Projects How to Increase the Likelihood of Successful Transfer to Industry -- Going Beyond the Empirical Difficulties in Running Experiments in the Software Industry: Experiences from the Trenches Planning for the Unknown: Lessons Learned from Ten Months of Non-participant Exploratory Observations in the Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1