Proactive Particles in Swarm Optimization: A settings-free algorithm for real-parameter single objective optimization problems

A. Tangherloni, L. Rundo, Marco S. Nobile
{"title":"Proactive Particles in Swarm Optimization: A settings-free algorithm for real-parameter single objective optimization problems","authors":"A. Tangherloni, L. Rundo, Marco S. Nobile","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2017.7969538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is an effective Swarm Intelligence technique for the optimization of non-linear and complex high-dimensional problems. Since PSO's performance is strongly dependent on the choice of its functioning settings, in this work we consider a self-tuning version of PSO, called Proactive Particles in Swarm Optimization (PPSO). PPSO leverages Fuzzy Logic to dynamically determine the best settings for the inertia weight, cognitive factor and social factor. The PPSO algorithm significantly differs from other versions of PSO relying on Fuzzy Logic, because specific settings are assigned to each particle according to its history, instead of being globally assigned to the whole swarm. In such a way, PPSO's particles gain a limited autonomous and proactive intelligence with respect to the reactive agents proposed by PSO. Our results show that PPSO achieves overall good optimization performances on the benchmark functions proposed in the CEC 2017 test suite, with the exception of those based on the Schwefel function, whose fitness landscape seems to mislead the fuzzy reasoning. Moreover, with many benchmark functions, PPSO is characterized by a higher speed of convergence than PSO in the case of high-dimensional problems.","PeriodicalId":335123,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2017.7969538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is an effective Swarm Intelligence technique for the optimization of non-linear and complex high-dimensional problems. Since PSO's performance is strongly dependent on the choice of its functioning settings, in this work we consider a self-tuning version of PSO, called Proactive Particles in Swarm Optimization (PPSO). PPSO leverages Fuzzy Logic to dynamically determine the best settings for the inertia weight, cognitive factor and social factor. The PPSO algorithm significantly differs from other versions of PSO relying on Fuzzy Logic, because specific settings are assigned to each particle according to its history, instead of being globally assigned to the whole swarm. In such a way, PPSO's particles gain a limited autonomous and proactive intelligence with respect to the reactive agents proposed by PSO. Our results show that PPSO achieves overall good optimization performances on the benchmark functions proposed in the CEC 2017 test suite, with the exception of those based on the Schwefel function, whose fitness landscape seems to mislead the fuzzy reasoning. Moreover, with many benchmark functions, PPSO is characterized by a higher speed of convergence than PSO in the case of high-dimensional problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动粒子群优化:一种无设置的实参数单目标优化算法
粒子群算法(PSO)是一种有效的群体智能算法,用于求解复杂的高维非线性问题。由于粒子群优化算法的性能强烈依赖于其功能设置的选择,因此在本研究中,我们考虑了粒子群优化算法的自调整版本,称为主动粒子群优化算法(PPSO)。PPSO利用模糊逻辑动态确定惯性权重、认知因素和社会因素的最佳设置。该算法与其他基于模糊逻辑的粒子群算法有很大的不同,因为它根据每个粒子的历史来分配特定的设置,而不是全局地分配给整个群体。通过这种方式,相对于PSO提出的反应剂,PPSO的粒子获得了有限的自主和主动智能。我们的研究结果表明,PPSO在CEC 2017测试套件中提出的基准函数上取得了总体良好的优化性能,但基于Schwefel函数的函数的适应度景观似乎误导了模糊推理。此外,由于具有许多基准函数,在高维问题下,粒子群算法具有比粒子群算法更快的收敛速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge-based particle swarm optimization for PID controller tuning Local Optima Networks of the Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem: Makespan vs. total flow time Information core optimization using Evolutionary Algorithm with Elite Population in recommender systems New heuristics for multi-objective worst-case optimization in evidence-based robust design Bus Routing for emergency evacuations: The case of the Great Fire of Valparaiso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1