Enhancing qualitative relative orientation with qualitative distance for robot path planning

M. Monferrer, F. T. Lobo
{"title":"Enhancing qualitative relative orientation with qualitative distance for robot path planning","authors":"M. Monferrer, F. T. Lobo","doi":"10.1109/TAI.1996.560449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans reason about different aspects of space (such as relative orientation, cardinal directions, distance, size and shape of objects) quite easily. With the aim of simulating human behavior, several models for these spatial concepts have been developed. Cognitive considerations have made these frameworks qualitative because it seems to deal better with the imprecision that human perception provides. Unfortunately no operational model which allows to reason with all these spatial aspects in an integrated way has been developed up to now. The first aim of our research has been the integration of different spatial concepts which is accomplished by the definition of an operational model based on first order predicate logic. Constraint logic programming extended with constraint handling rules provides the level of abstraction suited for the integration of qualitative relative orientation and qualitative distance. The second aim of our work is to apply qualitative spatial reasoning to robot path planning.","PeriodicalId":209171,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1996.560449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Humans reason about different aspects of space (such as relative orientation, cardinal directions, distance, size and shape of objects) quite easily. With the aim of simulating human behavior, several models for these spatial concepts have been developed. Cognitive considerations have made these frameworks qualitative because it seems to deal better with the imprecision that human perception provides. Unfortunately no operational model which allows to reason with all these spatial aspects in an integrated way has been developed up to now. The first aim of our research has been the integration of different spatial concepts which is accomplished by the definition of an operational model based on first order predicate logic. Constraint logic programming extended with constraint handling rules provides the level of abstraction suited for the integration of qualitative relative orientation and qualitative distance. The second aim of our work is to apply qualitative spatial reasoning to robot path planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用定性距离增强机器人路径规划的定性相对定向
人类对空间的不同方面(如相对方向、基本方向、距离、物体的大小和形状)进行推理是很容易的。为了模拟人类的行为,已经为这些空间概念开发了几个模型。认知方面的考虑使这些框架定性,因为它似乎更好地处理了人类感知提供的不精确性。不幸的是,到目前为止,还没有一个操作模型能够以一种综合的方式对所有这些空间方面进行推理。我们研究的第一个目标是通过定义一个基于一阶谓词逻辑的操作模型来实现不同空间概念的整合。约束逻辑规划扩展了约束处理规则,提供了适合于定性相对方向和定性距离集成的抽象层次。我们工作的第二个目标是将定性空间推理应用于机器人路径规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI tools in scheduling problem solving: a solver based on a "well-behaved" restriction of TCSPs A deliberative and reactive diagnosis agent based on logic programming Subdefinite models as a variety of constraint programming Oz Scheduler: a workbench for scheduling problems Automatic scale selection as a pre-processing stage to interpreting real-world data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1