{"title":"AKIBAT HUKUM PENERBITAN SURAT IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN (IUP) PADA KEKAYAAN ALAM KEPULAUAN SANGIHE","authors":"Zen Lutfulloh, Wahyu Donri","doi":"10.33701/jipwp.v47i2.2031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining is a strategic sector that must be utilized by the government as well as possible. In accordance with the mandate contained in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, the government or the state is obliged to serve every citizen and resident to fulfill their basic needs in the context of public services and improving the welfare of the community. One of the public services that get a bad impression in the community is related to licensing services. At the beginning of 2021, there was a case phenomenon that became a polemic of debate among the community, government and environmental health observers. The phenomenon is that it is easy for the government to issue a mining business permit (IUP) decree to PT Tambang Mas Sangihe (TMS) which substantially violates Law Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands as well as having a large potential to cause environmental damage because some of the the area that gets the mining permit is a protected forest which is home to several endemic animals and plants that are threatened with extinction. This study uses normative research methods to determine the legal consequences of the policy. The purpose of this study is to provide several points of consideration to the government in terms of re-evaluating the decree. The results of this study indicate that Decree Number 163.K/MB.04/DJB/2021 has legal consequences for re-evaluation because in addition to violating other laws, the decision has the potential to cause damage to the natural environment in the Sangihe Islands. \nKey Words: Mining, Licensing, Environment","PeriodicalId":228963,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v47i2.2031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mining is a strategic sector that must be utilized by the government as well as possible. In accordance with the mandate contained in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, the government or the state is obliged to serve every citizen and resident to fulfill their basic needs in the context of public services and improving the welfare of the community. One of the public services that get a bad impression in the community is related to licensing services. At the beginning of 2021, there was a case phenomenon that became a polemic of debate among the community, government and environmental health observers. The phenomenon is that it is easy for the government to issue a mining business permit (IUP) decree to PT Tambang Mas Sangihe (TMS) which substantially violates Law Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands as well as having a large potential to cause environmental damage because some of the the area that gets the mining permit is a protected forest which is home to several endemic animals and plants that are threatened with extinction. This study uses normative research methods to determine the legal consequences of the policy. The purpose of this study is to provide several points of consideration to the government in terms of re-evaluating the decree. The results of this study indicate that Decree Number 163.K/MB.04/DJB/2021 has legal consequences for re-evaluation because in addition to violating other laws, the decision has the potential to cause damage to the natural environment in the Sangihe Islands.
Key Words: Mining, Licensing, Environment
矿业是一个战略部门,政府必须尽可能地利用它。根据1945年《宪法》第33条的规定,政府或国家有义务为每一位公民和居民服务,以满足他们在公共服务和改善社区福利方面的基本需求。在社区中印象不好的公共服务之一与许可服务有关。2021年初,出现了一种个案现象,在社区、政府和环境卫生观察员之间引发了激烈的辩论。现象是,政府很容易向Tambang Mas Sangihe (TMS)颁发采矿业务许可证(IUP)法令,这严重违反了2007年第27号关于沿海地区和小岛屿管理的法律,而且有很大的可能造成环境破坏,因为一些获得采矿许可证的地区是受保护的森林,是几种濒临灭绝的特有动植物的家园。本研究采用规范的研究方法来确定政策的法律后果。本研究的目的是为政府在重新评估法令方面提供几点考虑。本研究结果显示,法令编号163.K/MB。04/DJB/2021对重新评估具有法律后果,因为除了违反其他法律外,该决定还可能对桑吉河群岛的自然环境造成破坏。关键词:矿业;许可证;环境