Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on 'Enterprise': Control and Autonomy in a Direct Selling Organisation **

C. Gross, Nicole Jung
{"title":"Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on 'Enterprise': Control and Autonomy in a Direct Selling Organisation **","authors":"C. Gross, Nicole Jung","doi":"10.1688/1861-9908_MREV_2009_04_GROSS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurialism within organisations has been praised for serving employees and employers alike, but it has also been criticised as exercising power over employees in an unobtrusive, yet effective way. Within the literature from both advocates and critics, two dichotomies prevail. First, ‘enterprise’ is considered as a monolithic concept that is either ‘liberating’ or governing employees; second, it tends to be viewed as strongly opposed to ‘bureaucracy’. Recent studies have started to challenge these hitherto often one-sided characterisations by showing that individuals react and respond differently to entrepreneurialism and that bureaucratic elements can co-exist within entrepreneurial companies. However, by drawing on empirical evidence from an entrepreneurial company, we demonstrate that enterprise within an organisation itself is a complex and paradoxical instrument of power and governance in organisations. We suppose that enterprise cannot stand on its own but is instead based upon organisational practices that are at the same time liberating and controlling, entrepreneurial and bureaucratic. Such a view not only allows one to pay attention to the fractions that are caused when the ideal of the individual self-made man is transferred to organisations, but also to question the enterprise discourse itself.","PeriodicalId":422075,"journal":{"name":"management revue. Socio-economic Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"management revue. Socio-economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1688/1861-9908_MREV_2009_04_GROSS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Entrepreneurialism within organisations has been praised for serving employees and employers alike, but it has also been criticised as exercising power over employees in an unobtrusive, yet effective way. Within the literature from both advocates and critics, two dichotomies prevail. First, ‘enterprise’ is considered as a monolithic concept that is either ‘liberating’ or governing employees; second, it tends to be viewed as strongly opposed to ‘bureaucracy’. Recent studies have started to challenge these hitherto often one-sided characterisations by showing that individuals react and respond differently to entrepreneurialism and that bureaucratic elements can co-exist within entrepreneurial companies. However, by drawing on empirical evidence from an entrepreneurial company, we demonstrate that enterprise within an organisation itself is a complex and paradoxical instrument of power and governance in organisations. We suppose that enterprise cannot stand on its own but is instead based upon organisational practices that are at the same time liberating and controlling, entrepreneurial and bureaucratic. Such a view not only allows one to pay attention to the fractions that are caused when the ideal of the individual self-made man is transferred to organisations, but also to question the enterprise discourse itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战“企业”的传统观念:直销组织中的控制与自主**
组织内部的企业家精神因服务于员工和雇主而受到赞扬,但也因以一种不引人注目但有效的方式对员工行使权力而受到批评。在支持者和批评者的文献中,两种二分法盛行。首先,“企业”被认为是一个整体概念,要么是“解放”员工,要么是管理员工;其次,它往往被视为与“官僚主义”的强烈对立。最近的研究已经开始挑战这些迄今为止往往是片面的特征,表明个人对创业精神的反应和反应不同,官僚主义因素可以在创业公司中共存。然而,通过借鉴一家创业型公司的经验证据,我们证明了组织内部的企业本身是组织中复杂而矛盾的权力和治理工具。我们认为,企业不能独立存在,而是建立在同时具有解放性和控制性、企业性和官僚性的组织实践的基础之上。这种观点不仅使人们能够关注当个体白手起家者的理想被转移到组织时所引起的分数,而且还使人们对企业话语本身提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moral awareness and different orders of relevance in participatory research with older people and professionals Action Research: A Participatory Approach to Improve Measures of Labour Market Integration of Refugees Call for Papers: Special issue of the International Journal of Action Research: Working with action research for sustainable and regenerative environments, communities, and organizations Incongruity between Work and Gender Roles: The Effects of Gender Stereotype Deviation on Job SatisfactionDate submitted: May 7, 2018Revised version accepted after double-blind review: August 31, 2019. Business Development in Post-Growth Economies: Challenging Assumptions in the Existing Business Growth Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1