Unprecedented challenges to higher education systems and academic collaboration

E. Hazelkorn, W. Locke, H. Coates, Hans de Wit
{"title":"Unprecedented challenges to higher education systems and academic collaboration","authors":"E. Hazelkorn, W. Locke, H. Coates, Hans de Wit","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2022.2103883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is in a transition from a relatively stable political, economic and social period towards one in considerable turmoil with radical implications for higher education. Climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic, rising nationalism, geopolitical tensions, inflation and economic instability, are just some of its main manifestations. With hindsight, there were already many hints of the direction of this transition, but its magnitude and speed seem to have taken the world and the higher education sector by surprise. We have already seen how the pandemic has disrupted higher education worldwide. We are now watching higher education challenged in its autonomy and academic freedom by nationalist-populist movements and governments in several parts of the world. Issues of national security, geopolitical conflicts and war are challenging academic collaboration and global science at a time when pursuance of the UN Sustainable Development Goals requires more partnerships and deeper transnational cooperation. These developments are occurring at a time when higher education – and tertiary education more broadly – already face questions about their role and purpose in the global era. Widening participation, and achieving greater equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) are key goals for higher education, but around the world access from primary to tertiary education is still restricted, particularly for the 84 million people currently displaced around the globe. The Russian invasion of Ukraine forces us to be clear and outspoken against any attacks or restrictions on human rights and democratic values as well as on academic freedom, and at the same time keep our channels of communication and collaboration as open as possible. The response of higher education to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown how the internationalization of higher education and research can help solve global challenges. In contrast, the invasion of Ukraine and growing geo-political tensions highlight the fragility of those links and the vulnerability of higher education and research. Global engagement over the last few decades has been a key priority of higher education. The global knowledge economy created more competition between universities, but it also stimulated cooperation and exchange of people and science, although primarily for the benefit of the global north. Current geopolitical tensions pose very serious challenges for this global engagement. While diffuse and complex, the implications for global engagement in higher education and research in these volatile times are likely to be severe. As Altbach and de Wit (2022) state, ‘The debate about academic engagement and academic values is not an easy one. The academic boycott against the apartheid regime in South Africa taught us that blanket boycotts are in no one’s interest’. One of the collateral results of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the loss of rationality in segments of the academic community in North America and Europe. In response, they argue that engagement with Russian colleagues – and knowledge about Russia taking into account all perspectives and viewpoints – is vital. They state:","PeriodicalId":212965,"journal":{"name":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2103883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The world is in a transition from a relatively stable political, economic and social period towards one in considerable turmoil with radical implications for higher education. Climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic, rising nationalism, geopolitical tensions, inflation and economic instability, are just some of its main manifestations. With hindsight, there were already many hints of the direction of this transition, but its magnitude and speed seem to have taken the world and the higher education sector by surprise. We have already seen how the pandemic has disrupted higher education worldwide. We are now watching higher education challenged in its autonomy and academic freedom by nationalist-populist movements and governments in several parts of the world. Issues of national security, geopolitical conflicts and war are challenging academic collaboration and global science at a time when pursuance of the UN Sustainable Development Goals requires more partnerships and deeper transnational cooperation. These developments are occurring at a time when higher education – and tertiary education more broadly – already face questions about their role and purpose in the global era. Widening participation, and achieving greater equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) are key goals for higher education, but around the world access from primary to tertiary education is still restricted, particularly for the 84 million people currently displaced around the globe. The Russian invasion of Ukraine forces us to be clear and outspoken against any attacks or restrictions on human rights and democratic values as well as on academic freedom, and at the same time keep our channels of communication and collaboration as open as possible. The response of higher education to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown how the internationalization of higher education and research can help solve global challenges. In contrast, the invasion of Ukraine and growing geo-political tensions highlight the fragility of those links and the vulnerability of higher education and research. Global engagement over the last few decades has been a key priority of higher education. The global knowledge economy created more competition between universities, but it also stimulated cooperation and exchange of people and science, although primarily for the benefit of the global north. Current geopolitical tensions pose very serious challenges for this global engagement. While diffuse and complex, the implications for global engagement in higher education and research in these volatile times are likely to be severe. As Altbach and de Wit (2022) state, ‘The debate about academic engagement and academic values is not an easy one. The academic boycott against the apartheid regime in South Africa taught us that blanket boycotts are in no one’s interest’. One of the collateral results of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the loss of rationality in segments of the academic community in North America and Europe. In response, they argue that engagement with Russian colleagues – and knowledge about Russia taking into account all perspectives and viewpoints – is vital. They state:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育体系和学术合作面临前所未有的挑战
世界正从一个相对稳定的政治、经济和社会时期过渡到一个相当动荡的时期,这对高等教育产生了根本性的影响。气候变化、COVID-19大流行、民族主义抬头、地缘政治紧张、通货膨胀和经济不稳定,只是其主要表现之一。事后看来,已经有很多迹象表明这种转变的方向,但其规模和速度似乎让世界和高等教育部门感到惊讶。我们已经看到这场大流行是如何扰乱全球高等教育的。我们现在看到,高等教育的自主权和学术自由受到民族主义-民粹主义运动和世界一些地区政府的挑战。在实现联合国可持续发展目标需要更多伙伴关系、深化跨国合作的背景下,国家安全、地缘政治冲突和战争等问题给学术合作和全球科学带来挑战。这些发展发生之际,高等教育——以及更广泛的高等教育——已经面临着它们在全球化时代的角色和目的的问题。扩大参与和实现更大的公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)是高等教育的关键目标,但在世界各地,从小学到高等教育的机会仍然有限,特别是对目前全球8400万流离失所者而言。俄罗斯入侵乌克兰迫使我们明确和直言不讳地反对任何对人权和民主价值观以及学术自由的攻击或限制,同时保持我们的沟通和合作渠道尽可能开放。高等教育对新冠肺炎大流行的应对表明,高等教育和研究的国际化有助于解决全球挑战。相比之下,入侵乌克兰和日益紧张的地缘政治局势凸显了这些联系的脆弱性,以及高等教育和研究的脆弱性。在过去几十年里,全球参与一直是高等教育的一个关键优先事项。全球知识经济在大学之间创造了更多的竞争,但它也刺激了人员和科学的合作与交流,尽管主要是为了全球北方的利益。当前的地缘政治紧张局势对这种全球接触构成了非常严峻的挑战。在这个动荡的时代,这对全球参与高等教育和研究的影响虽然广泛而复杂,但可能是严重的。正如Altbach和de Wit(2022)所说,“关于学术参与和学术价值的辩论并不容易。对南非种族隔离政权的学术抵制告诉我们,全面抵制不符合任何人的利益。”俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的附带后果之一是,北美和欧洲的部分学术界失去了理性。作为回应,他们辩称,与俄罗斯同事的接触——以及考虑到所有角度和观点的对俄罗斯的了解——至关重要。他们状态:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peeling the multiple layers of inequalities in free higher education policies Intermediary organizations and their role in advancing the SDGs in higher education Provincial government and institution level strategy setting: the case of building Chinese ‘world-class universities’ POLICY REVIEWS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EDITORIAL, Volume 7, Issue 2, September 2023 Isomorphic tensions and anxiety in UK social science doctoral provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1