Withholding Compassion

A. Sirriyeh
{"title":"Withholding Compassion","authors":"A. Sirriyeh","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200423.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how governments have mobilised a discourse of compassion to reinforce a divide between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ immigrants and refugees, and therefore withhold compassion from those unable to enact the conditions necessary for recognition as a worthy subject of compassion. It first explains how governments have deployed the feeling and framing rules of the emotional regime of compassion to withhold compassion from immigrants and refugees. It then describes two policy case studies that emphasised the vulnerability of immigrants and refugees: the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme in the UK and the Australian Syrian and Iraqi Humanitarian Programme. It also analyses Donald Trump's presidential election campaign in 2016 to show how ‘suffering citizens’ have become centred as the legitimate subjects of compassion, at the expense of migrants and refugees.","PeriodicalId":425934,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Compassion","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Compassion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529200423.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how governments have mobilised a discourse of compassion to reinforce a divide between ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ immigrants and refugees, and therefore withhold compassion from those unable to enact the conditions necessary for recognition as a worthy subject of compassion. It first explains how governments have deployed the feeling and framing rules of the emotional regime of compassion to withhold compassion from immigrants and refugees. It then describes two policy case studies that emphasised the vulnerability of immigrants and refugees: the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme in the UK and the Australian Syrian and Iraqi Humanitarian Programme. It also analyses Donald Trump's presidential election campaign in 2016 to show how ‘suffering citizens’ have become centred as the legitimate subjects of compassion, at the expense of migrants and refugees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扣缴同情
本章研究了政府如何动员同情的话语来加强“值得”和“不值得”移民和难民之间的鸿沟,因此对那些无法制定必要条件以被认可为值得同情的主体的人不给予同情。它首先解释了政府是如何运用情感和同情的框架规则来抑制对移民和难民的同情的。然后,它描述了两个强调移民和难民脆弱性的政策案例研究:英国的叙利亚弱势群体重新安置计划和澳大利亚的叙利亚和伊拉克人道主义计划。它还分析了唐纳德·特朗普在2016年的总统竞选活动,以展示“受苦的公民”如何以牺牲移民和难民为代价,成为同情的合法对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion List of Illustrations 3. Civic Engagement in the Recovery Period Acknowledgments Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1