Public Green Space Planning and Management towards Livable City

Budi Heru Santosa, R. Koestoer
{"title":"Public Green Space Planning and Management towards Livable City","authors":"Budi Heru Santosa, R. Koestoer","doi":"10.1109/AGERS51788.2020.9452765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban public green spaces (PGS), with their ecological, health support, and social functions needed by the community, would grow in terms of absolute number and spatial distributed populations. However, PGS's volume and spatial areas did not expand linearly to population growth; even in some cases, there has even been a decrease in volume and area for PGS. This paper examines PGS's planning process and management, which faces problems due to the population growth that requires more settlement areas and other socioeconomic facilities. The methodology applied was a comparative study in planning and managing PGS for two cases, Munich and the Yogyakarta municipal areas, which regionally have similar characteristics. The result shows that both regions tend to have proper governance for PGS. Also, both regions tend to have similar urban spatial structures associated with distributed growth centers of the polycentric system and address similar problems related to population growth. Despite the facts, both have differences in community perception of livable city function, especially for community cultural and social-relational aspects. In conclusion, this paper has highlighted that PGS's comprehensive planning is indispensable to achieve ecological, health support, and social functions to attain a livable city; therefore, a dynamic spatial model that considers variables: housing demand, urban spatial structure, urban growth form, and also community participation, could be a useful detecting tool to measure the level of development.","PeriodicalId":125663,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGERS51788.2020.9452765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Urban public green spaces (PGS), with their ecological, health support, and social functions needed by the community, would grow in terms of absolute number and spatial distributed populations. However, PGS's volume and spatial areas did not expand linearly to population growth; even in some cases, there has even been a decrease in volume and area for PGS. This paper examines PGS's planning process and management, which faces problems due to the population growth that requires more settlement areas and other socioeconomic facilities. The methodology applied was a comparative study in planning and managing PGS for two cases, Munich and the Yogyakarta municipal areas, which regionally have similar characteristics. The result shows that both regions tend to have proper governance for PGS. Also, both regions tend to have similar urban spatial structures associated with distributed growth centers of the polycentric system and address similar problems related to population growth. Despite the facts, both have differences in community perception of livable city function, especially for community cultural and social-relational aspects. In conclusion, this paper has highlighted that PGS's comprehensive planning is indispensable to achieve ecological, health support, and social functions to attain a livable city; therefore, a dynamic spatial model that considers variables: housing demand, urban spatial structure, urban growth form, and also community participation, could be a useful detecting tool to measure the level of development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向宜居城市的公共绿地规划与管理
城市公共绿地(PGS)在绝对数量和空间分布上都将不断增长,其生态、健康支持和社区所需的社会功能。然而,PGS的体积和空间面积并没有随着人口的增长而线性增长;甚至在某些情况下,PGS的体积和面积甚至有所减少。由于人口增长对聚落面积和其他社会经济设施的需求增加,PGS的规划过程和管理面临着一些问题。所采用的方法是对慕尼黑和日惹市这两个在区域上具有相似特点的城市地区的规划和管理规划系统进行比较研究。结果表明,这两个地区都倾向于对PGS进行适当的治理。此外,这两个地区往往具有与多中心系统的分布式增长中心相关的类似城市空间结构,并解决与人口增长有关的类似问题。尽管如此,两者在社区对宜居城市功能的认知上存在差异,特别是在社区文化和社会关系方面。综上所述,PGS的综合规划是实现生态、健康和社会功能,实现宜居城市的必要条件;因此,一个考虑了住房需求、城市空间结构、城市增长形式和社区参与等变量的动态空间模型可以成为衡量发展水平的有用检测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seasonal Analysis of the Hotspot Spatial Grid in Indonesia and the Relationship of the Hotspot Grid with the Nino SST Indices Radiometric Enhancement of Landsat 8 OLI Imagery Using Coastal/Aerosol Band Development of near real-time and archival Tsunami data visualization dashboard for Indonesia Flood Monitoring with Information Extraction Approach from Social Media Data Data Interoperability and Repository for Oceanography Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1