EC Banana Dispute and the GATT/WTO

Norio Komuro
{"title":"EC Banana Dispute and the GATT/WTO","authors":"Norio Komuro","doi":"10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notorious banana saga has been dealt with on three levels : the GATT/WTO, the EC Court of Justice(\"ECJ\")and EC Member States' courts. These different f ora did not render convergent decisions, but rather complicated the matter further. Clearly, the EC banana regime favoured EC and ACP bananas to the detriment of third-country bananas. GATT/ WTO panels supported arguments by non-ACP parties and found the banana regime to be inconsistent with EC's obligations under GATT/WTO nondiscrimination rules. However, the ECJ has rejected legal challenges against the EC regime, thus giving rise to conflicts with GATT /WTO findings and national courts. This paper reviews the banana dispute before the GATT/WTO, the ECJ and national courts to compare each judicial control over the EC trade","PeriodicalId":299812,"journal":{"name":"EU Studies in Japan","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5135/EUSJ1997.2000.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The notorious banana saga has been dealt with on three levels : the GATT/WTO, the EC Court of Justice("ECJ")and EC Member States' courts. These different f ora did not render convergent decisions, but rather complicated the matter further. Clearly, the EC banana regime favoured EC and ACP bananas to the detriment of third-country bananas. GATT/ WTO panels supported arguments by non-ACP parties and found the banana regime to be inconsistent with EC's obligations under GATT/WTO nondiscrimination rules. However, the ECJ has rejected legal challenges against the EC regime, thus giving rise to conflicts with GATT /WTO findings and national courts. This paper reviews the banana dispute before the GATT/WTO, the ECJ and national courts to compare each judicial control over the EC trade
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧共体香蕉争端与关贸总协定/世贸组织
臭名昭著的香蕉事件已经在三个层面上得到处理:关贸总协定/世贸组织、欧共体法院和欧共体成员国的法院。这些不同的论坛并没有作出一致的决定,反而使问题进一步复杂化。显然,欧共体香蕉制度有利于欧共体和非加太香蕉,损害了第三国的香蕉。关贸总协定/世贸组织专家组支持非非加太缔约方的论点,认为香蕉制度不符合欧共体在关贸总协定/世贸组织非歧视规则下的义务。然而,欧洲法院拒绝了对欧共体制度的法律挑战,从而引起了与关贸总协定/世界贸易组织的调查结果和国家法院的冲突。本文回顾了关贸总协定/世贸组织、欧洲法院和各国法院审理的香蕉争端,比较了各国法院对欧共体贸易的司法控制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Russia-China approach and its impact on the Euro Subject or Object?:Europe in Sino-American Competition Progress and Challenges of EU Retail Payments Market Integration Legal Implications of the Japan-EU Strategic Partnership Agreement How can the stability of the Euro be secured ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1