Revision of Security Proof on f-OAEP

Jie Liu, Gongliang Chen, Jianhua Li
{"title":"Revision of Security Proof on f-OAEP","authors":"Jie Liu, Gongliang Chen, Jianhua Li","doi":"10.1109/ISA.2008.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OAEP is widely accepted because of its provable security and practicability. However, there was a twist in the security proof in the random oracle model. Shoup revealed a flaw in the original security proof by Bellare and Rogaway. In this paper, a revision of the security proof is presented to fix the flaw. Furthermore, compared with some existing improved prove methods, the revised proof is applicable for the underlying trapdoor permutation being a general case.","PeriodicalId":212375,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISA.2008.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OAEP is widely accepted because of its provable security and practicability. However, there was a twist in the security proof in the random oracle model. Shoup revealed a flaw in the original security proof by Bellare and Rogaway. In this paper, a revision of the security proof is presented to fix the flaw. Furthermore, compared with some existing improved prove methods, the revised proof is applicable for the underlying trapdoor permutation being a general case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
f-OAEP安全证明的修订
OAEP因其可验证的安全性和实用性而被广泛接受。然而,在随机oracle模型的安全性证明中有一个转折。Shoup在Bellare和Rogaway的原始安全证明中发现了一个漏洞。本文提出了一种改进的安全证明来弥补这一缺陷。此外,与现有的一些改进证明方法相比,修正证明作为一般情况适用于底层陷门排列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Electronic Communication Technology - VT Position Code Communication Technology and Its Implementation CRYPTEX Model for Software Source Code The Economics of Privacy-Privacy: People, Policy and Technology Why MSN Lost to QQ in China Market? Different Privacy Protection Design Maximizing Return on Security Safeguard Investment with Constraint Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1