Chairmanship: The Effective Chair-CEO Relationship - Insight from the Boardroom

A. Walton
{"title":"Chairmanship: The Effective Chair-CEO Relationship - Insight from the Boardroom","authors":"A. Walton","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2579311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2011 Chairmanship report published by Yale’s Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance examines the question of how the non-executive Chair and the CEO, both important roles in the corporate governance, can work together effectively toward the corporate best interest. Based on interviews with dozens of CEOs, non-executive Chairs, and stakeholders, the report paints a picture of how the effective relationship works.The report identifies three major areas that characterize an effective working relationship: chemistry, a clear framework, and a supportive context. Most commonly mentioned in interviews was good Chair-CEO chemistry – that is, the direct interpersonal relationship between the two. Expanding on the chemistry concept, Chairs and CEOs identified effective communications as underlying factor. Effective communications included frequent contact, open, ongoing dialogue, and a mix of formal and informal venues. Also supporting good chemistry was reciprocity and consideration – keeping each other well informed, avoiding surprises, and assuming good intent.Communications should be purposeful – and while the relationship might be close, it should not become a personal friendship. Chairs and CEOs alike felt their good communications created an overall environment conducive to sharing, learning, and confidence.Other areas, such as a clear framework and a supportive context were also identified. A clear framework also meant having the right processes, usually around key areas of board responsibilities such as managing the board agenda, material financial decisions, major transactions such as acquisitions, compensation, C-suite personnel, and succession planning. Three elements of board context also effected the Chair-CEO relationship – a talented executive team, a strong supportive board and a culture of transparency promoted an effective working relationship between the Chair and CEO.As this leadership structure becomes more prevalent, these insights and guidelines should be useful to those working together in these interdependent roles. Effective working Chair-CEO relationships may create value for shareholders in ways that neither leader could do alone.","PeriodicalId":376768,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2579311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2011 Chairmanship report published by Yale’s Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance examines the question of how the non-executive Chair and the CEO, both important roles in the corporate governance, can work together effectively toward the corporate best interest. Based on interviews with dozens of CEOs, non-executive Chairs, and stakeholders, the report paints a picture of how the effective relationship works.The report identifies three major areas that characterize an effective working relationship: chemistry, a clear framework, and a supportive context. Most commonly mentioned in interviews was good Chair-CEO chemistry – that is, the direct interpersonal relationship between the two. Expanding on the chemistry concept, Chairs and CEOs identified effective communications as underlying factor. Effective communications included frequent contact, open, ongoing dialogue, and a mix of formal and informal venues. Also supporting good chemistry was reciprocity and consideration – keeping each other well informed, avoiding surprises, and assuming good intent.Communications should be purposeful – and while the relationship might be close, it should not become a personal friendship. Chairs and CEOs alike felt their good communications created an overall environment conducive to sharing, learning, and confidence.Other areas, such as a clear framework and a supportive context were also identified. A clear framework also meant having the right processes, usually around key areas of board responsibilities such as managing the board agenda, material financial decisions, major transactions such as acquisitions, compensation, C-suite personnel, and succession planning. Three elements of board context also effected the Chair-CEO relationship – a talented executive team, a strong supportive board and a culture of transparency promoted an effective working relationship between the Chair and CEO.As this leadership structure becomes more prevalent, these insights and guidelines should be useful to those working together in these interdependent roles. Effective working Chair-CEO relationships may create value for shareholders in ways that neither leader could do alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主席职位:有效的主席与ceo关系——来自董事会的洞察
耶鲁大学米尔斯坦公司治理与绩效中心(Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance)发布的《2011年董事长报告》探讨了非执行董事长和首席执行官这两个在公司治理中都很重要的角色如何有效地合作,以实现公司的最佳利益。基于对数十位首席执行官、非执行董事长和利益相关者的采访,该报告描绘了一幅有效关系如何运作的图景。该报告确定了有效工作关系的三个主要特征:化学反应、清晰的框架和支持性的环境。采访中最常提到的是董事长与ceo之间的良好化学反应——即两者之间的直接人际关系。在化学概念的基础上,董事长和首席执行官们认为有效的沟通是潜在的因素。有效的沟通包括频繁的接触、公开的、持续的对话,以及正式和非正式场合的结合。同样支持良好化学反应的是互惠和考虑——让对方充分了解情况,避免意外,并假设有良好的意图。沟通应该是有目的的——虽然关系可能很亲密,但不应该变成私人友谊。主席和首席执行官们都认为,良好的沟通创造了一个有利于分享、学习和自信的整体环境。还确定了其他领域,例如明确的框架和支持性环境。一个清晰的框架还意味着有正确的流程,通常围绕董事会职责的关键领域,如管理董事会议程、重大财务决策、重大交易(如收购)、薪酬、高管人员和继任计划。董事会背景的三个因素也影响了主席与首席执行官的关系——优秀的执行团队、强有力的董事会支持和透明的文化促进了主席与首席执行官之间有效的工作关系。随着这种领导结构变得越来越普遍,这些见解和指导方针应该对那些在这些相互依赖的角色中一起工作的人有用。有效的主席- ceo关系可能会为股东创造价值,这是任何一位领导人都无法单独做到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Overconfidence and Self-Reported Success How to Talk Down Your Stock Performance Director Overconfidence Mergers and the Market for Busy Directors: An International Analysis When Inequality is Good for Groups: The Moderating Role of Fairness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1