Dynamic capabilities for orchestrating digital innovation ecosystems: Conceptual integration and research opportunities

IF 5.7 2区管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Organization Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100422

Bastian Kindermann , Torsten Oliver Salge , Daniel Wentzel , Tessa Christina Flatten , David Antons

{"title":"Dynamic capabilities for orchestrating digital innovation ecosystems: Conceptual integration and research opportunities","authors":"Bastian Kindermann , Torsten Oliver Salge , Daniel Wentzel , Tessa Christina Flatten , David Antons","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While most previous research on orchestration of digital innovation ecosystems has examined governance structures, our knowledge of relevant dynamic capabilities remains abstract and lacks conceptual integration. This imbalance limits current knowledge to the extent that digital innovation ecosystem orchestration is mainly considered a structural issue. Based on a synthesis of related literature, we present a novel dynamic capabilities framework that builds on sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities for digital innovation ecosystem orchestration. We differentiate two major challenges addressed in orchestrating such ecosystems: component challenges and complement challenges. We propose six concrete routines that collectively help address these challenges. These include co-creating architectural knowledge, cultivating boundary objects, renegotiating system integration, screening complementors, co-specializing interfaces, and restructuring complementarities. We illustrate each of these routines with examples from the automotive sector. In addition, we sketch trajectories for future research both at the level of the individual routines and at the level of the overall framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 3","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772722000355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

While most previous research on orchestration of digital innovation ecosystems has examined governance structures, our knowledge of relevant dynamic capabilities remains abstract and lacks conceptual integration. This imbalance limits current knowledge to the extent that digital innovation ecosystem orchestration is mainly considered a structural issue. Based on a synthesis of related literature, we present a novel dynamic capabilities framework that builds on sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities for digital innovation ecosystem orchestration. We differentiate two major challenges addressed in orchestrating such ecosystems: component challenges and complement challenges. We propose six concrete routines that collectively help address these challenges. These include co-creating architectural knowledge, cultivating boundary objects, renegotiating system integration, screening complementors, co-specializing interfaces, and restructuring complementarities. We illustrate each of these routines with examples from the automotive sector. In addition, we sketch trajectories for future research both at the level of the individual routines and at the level of the overall framework.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

协调数字创新生态系统的动态能力:概念整合和研究机会

虽然之前大多数关于数字创新生态系统编排的研究都考察了治理结构，但我们对相关动态能力的认识仍然是抽象的，缺乏概念整合。这种不平衡限制了目前的认识，数字创新生态系统的协调主要被认为是一个结构性问题。在综合相关文献的基础上，我们提出了一个新的动态能力框架，该框架建立在数字创新生态系统编排的感知、捕捉和重新配置能力的基础上。我们区分了协调这样的生态系统所面临的两个主要挑战:组件挑战和补充挑战。我们提出了六个具体的例程，共同帮助应对这些挑战。这些包括共同创建架构知识、培养边界对象、重新协商系统集成、筛选互补性、共同专门化接口和重组互补性。我们用汽车行业的例子来说明这些例程。此外，我们在个体例程水平和整体框架水平上勾画了未来研究的轨迹。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

IF 7 3区医学Innovation in AgingPub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igz038.2803

P. Teaster, Karen A. Roberto, J. Savla

POLICY SERIES: ELDER ABUSE AND THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC IN RURAL AMERICA

IF 7 3区医学Innovation in AgingPub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igz038.2801

Brian W. Lindberg, R. Blancato

Supplemental Material for Elder Abuse and the Opioid Epidemic: Evidence From APS Cases in Central Appalachia

IF 0 Journal of rural mental healthPub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1037/rmh0000181.supp

来源期刊

Information and Organization Multiple-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.

期刊最新文献

Stability and change in digital transformation: A repertoire model of institutionally embedded technology affordances Virtual social contagion in online support communities Transformed knowledge work infrastructures in times of forced remote work Editorial Board Digital innovation, platforms, and global strategy