Cold, Hard Justice Lessons from the Fleet: Innovating from the Bottom Up

O. Ha-Redeye
{"title":"Cold, Hard Justice Lessons from the Fleet: Innovating from the Bottom Up","authors":"O. Ha-Redeye","doi":"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With law school graduates encountering increased difficulty in securing articling positions, legal incubators are an alternative way of providing practical training and mentorship opportunities for young practitioners. Not only do they have the potential to help launch careers in law, but they can also play a major role in increasing access to justice. Though legal incubators have been gaining popularity in law schools across the United States, they are still a novel concept in Canada. This article discusses the resources and practice models used by Fleet Street Law, a law practice in Toronto that evolved into the first legal incubator in Canada. The use of innovative business models allowed for greater service of low income and marginalized populations, especially on a “low-bono” rate, and also assisted in providing essential supports for racialized and minority lawyers early in their career. The flexible and innovative nature of a legal incubator was beneficial for the purposes of experimentation, but there were challenges associated with cost and long-term participation. The model of a practitioner-based incubator, as an alternative to traditional-type clinics, should be strongly considered by law schools to help address some of the market needs in the legal community today.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With law school graduates encountering increased difficulty in securing articling positions, legal incubators are an alternative way of providing practical training and mentorship opportunities for young practitioners. Not only do they have the potential to help launch careers in law, but they can also play a major role in increasing access to justice. Though legal incubators have been gaining popularity in law schools across the United States, they are still a novel concept in Canada. This article discusses the resources and practice models used by Fleet Street Law, a law practice in Toronto that evolved into the first legal incubator in Canada. The use of innovative business models allowed for greater service of low income and marginalized populations, especially on a “low-bono” rate, and also assisted in providing essential supports for racialized and minority lawyers early in their career. The flexible and innovative nature of a legal incubator was beneficial for the purposes of experimentation, but there were challenges associated with cost and long-term participation. The model of a practitioner-based incubator, as an alternative to traditional-type clinics, should be strongly considered by law schools to help address some of the market needs in the legal community today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自舰队的冷酷无情的司法教训:自下而上的创新
随着法学院毕业生越来越难以获得文章职位,法律孵化器是为年轻从业者提供实践培训和指导机会的另一种方式。他们不仅有潜力帮助开展法律职业,而且还可以在增加诉诸司法方面发挥重要作用。尽管法律孵化器在美国各地的法学院越来越受欢迎,但在加拿大,这仍然是一个新概念。本文讨论了多伦多的Fleet Street Law所使用的资源和实践模式。Fleet Street Law是加拿大第一个法律孵化器。利用创新的商业模式,可以为低收入和边缘人口提供更多的服务,特别是以“低无偿”费率,并有助于为种族化和少数民族律师在其职业生涯早期提供必要的支持。法律孵化器的灵活和创新性质有利于实验目的,但在成本和长期参与方面存在挑战。以从业者为基础的孵化器模式,作为传统类型诊所的替代方案,应该得到法学院的大力考虑,以帮助解决当今法律界的一些市场需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lawyer Brain - Transform your Well-being and Develop a Performance Edge The Scholarly Impact Matrix: An Empirical Study of How Multiple Metrics Create an Informed Story of a Scholar's Work Law and Economics Under the Palms: Henry Manne at the University of Miami, 1974–1980 Curriculum Decolonisation and Revisionist Pedagogy of African Customary Law Правовое просвещение, электронная демократия и медиаобразование: основы эффективной интеграции (Legal Education, e-Democracy and Media Education: The Basis of Effective Integration)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1