Australia’s Journey to Ratification of the ICESCR and ICCPR

A. Devereux
{"title":"Australia’s Journey to Ratification of the ICESCR and ICCPR","authors":"A. Devereux","doi":"10.1163/26660229_03601009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores Australia’s journey to ratification of the ICESCR and ICCPR. From a somewhat languorous consideration of the Covenants following their adoption by the General Assembly in 1966, the Australian federal government moved to enthusiastically support signature and ratification after the election of the Whitlam government. However, tensions over federal-State demarcations and the potential use of the external affairs power stymied progress. It was not until the Fraser government period that each Covenant was ratified. Exploring this history reveals the depth of divisions concerning respective roles of the Commonwealth and the States in the human rights arena and highlights the role of ‘lighter’ interpretations of obligations in facilitating consensus.","PeriodicalId":119796,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Year Book of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Year Book of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229_03601009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores Australia’s journey to ratification of the ICESCR and ICCPR. From a somewhat languorous consideration of the Covenants following their adoption by the General Assembly in 1966, the Australian federal government moved to enthusiastically support signature and ratification after the election of the Whitlam government. However, tensions over federal-State demarcations and the potential use of the external affairs power stymied progress. It was not until the Fraser government period that each Covenant was ratified. Exploring this history reveals the depth of divisions concerning respective roles of the Commonwealth and the States in the human rights arena and highlights the role of ‘lighter’ interpretations of obligations in facilitating consensus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚批准ICESCR和ICCPR的历程
本文探讨了澳大利亚批准《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》和《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的历程。1966年大会通过《公约》后,澳大利亚联邦政府对《公约》进行了有些倦怠的审议,在惠特拉姆政府当选后,澳大利亚联邦政府热情地支持签署和批准《公约》。但是,联邦与国家划界的紧张局势和可能动用外交权力阻碍了进展。直到弗雷泽政府时期,每一项公约才得到批准。对这段历史的探索揭示了英联邦和各国在人权领域各自角色的深刻分歧,并突出了对义务的“较轻”解释在促进共识方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Origins of the Right of Self-Defence in International Law: From the Caroline Incident to the United Nations Charter The Timor Sea Treaty: An Australian Perspective The Timor Sea Conciliation and Treaty: Timor-Leste’s Perspective Cases before International Courts and Tribunals concerning Questions of Public International Law Involving Australia 2017 Kirby Lecture in International Law 2018: The Duality of Water: Conflict or Co-operation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1