Changes in the Public Experience of Citizens due to Digital Transformation

Jiweon Seon, Hwalbin Kim
{"title":"Changes in the Public Experience of Citizens due to Digital Transformation","authors":"Jiweon Seon, Hwalbin Kim","doi":"10.58555/li.2022.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public experience (in German, öffentliche Erfahrung) is a general term for activities in the public domain as a citizen, such as direct or indirect public opinion forming process as opposed to private experience, that is, activities with private benefits. The widespread use of intelligent information technology affects not only private activities in industry and life, but also public experience. \nFrom the perspective of inclusion, it is necessary to examine digital transformation or technological development and changes in public experience in two directions. First, it should be considered that digital transformation in the public domain cannot be viewed as having only a positive function through technological progress. Second, it is necessary to explore what is a desirable method of public debate for the social acceptance of intelligent information technology. From these two perspectives, it is needed to look at what kind of change public experience shows. Next, in order to incorporate the values pursued by society into a changing society, it is required to explore how to systematically utilize and adjust such changes. \nIn terms of public experience, digital transformation has the advantage of being able to increase participation quantitatively as well as materializing it through digital communication technology. \nHowever, in terms of inclusion, technology can rather cause digital divide and public experience divide, and such divides are not limited to individual problems, but also extend to regional problems. Due to the digitization of the means of public experience, the adverse effects of increasing controllability, problems of anonymity and bias, and weakening the accountability of participants are also conceivable. In order to maximize the advantages of intelligent information technology for public experiences and to promote the path to an inclusive society, institutional considerations are needed to solve the above problems. Measures are needed to eliminate the personal gap caused by the use of intelligent information technology and the competency gap of local governments related to the implementation of the public experience system. In addition, in order to minimize adverse functions related to individual public experiences of participants, it is necessary to take long-term and short-term measures to enhance digital citizenship as well as organized governance for various data management including public data.","PeriodicalId":115318,"journal":{"name":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","volume":"289 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public experience (in German, öffentliche Erfahrung) is a general term for activities in the public domain as a citizen, such as direct or indirect public opinion forming process as opposed to private experience, that is, activities with private benefits. The widespread use of intelligent information technology affects not only private activities in industry and life, but also public experience. From the perspective of inclusion, it is necessary to examine digital transformation or technological development and changes in public experience in two directions. First, it should be considered that digital transformation in the public domain cannot be viewed as having only a positive function through technological progress. Second, it is necessary to explore what is a desirable method of public debate for the social acceptance of intelligent information technology. From these two perspectives, it is needed to look at what kind of change public experience shows. Next, in order to incorporate the values pursued by society into a changing society, it is required to explore how to systematically utilize and adjust such changes. In terms of public experience, digital transformation has the advantage of being able to increase participation quantitatively as well as materializing it through digital communication technology. However, in terms of inclusion, technology can rather cause digital divide and public experience divide, and such divides are not limited to individual problems, but also extend to regional problems. Due to the digitization of the means of public experience, the adverse effects of increasing controllability, problems of anonymity and bias, and weakening the accountability of participants are also conceivable. In order to maximize the advantages of intelligent information technology for public experiences and to promote the path to an inclusive society, institutional considerations are needed to solve the above problems. Measures are needed to eliminate the personal gap caused by the use of intelligent information technology and the competency gap of local governments related to the implementation of the public experience system. In addition, in order to minimize adverse functions related to individual public experiences of participants, it is necessary to take long-term and short-term measures to enhance digital citizenship as well as organized governance for various data management including public data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化转型对公民公共体验的影响
公共经验(德语:öffentliche Erfahrung)是公民在公共领域活动的总称,如与私人经验相对立的直接或间接的舆论形成过程,即具有私人利益的活动。智能信息技术的广泛应用不仅影响着工业和生活中的私人活动,也影响着公众的体验。从包容性的角度来看,有必要从两个方向审视数字化转型或技术发展与公共体验的变化。首先,应该考虑到,公共领域的数字化转型不能仅仅被视为通过技术进步具有积极作用。其次,有必要探讨什么是公众辩论的理想方法,以使社会接受智能信息技术。从这两个角度来看,需要看看公共体验表现出什么样的变化。其次,为了将社会所追求的价值融入到不断变化的社会中,需要探索如何系统地利用和调整这种变化。在公众体验方面,数字化转型的优势在于能够通过数字通信技术在数量上增加参与,并将其具体化。然而,在包容性方面,技术反而会造成数字鸿沟和公众经验鸿沟,而且这种鸿沟不仅限于个体问题,还会延伸到区域问题。由于公共体验手段的数字化,增加可控性的不利影响、匿名性和偏见的问题以及削弱参与者的问责制也是可以想象的。为了最大限度地发挥智能信息技术在公共体验方面的优势,推动包容性社会的发展,需要从制度上考虑解决上述问题。需要采取措施消除因使用智能信息技术而造成的个人差距和与公共体验制度实施相关的地方政府的能力差距。此外,为了最大限度地减少与参与者个人公共体验相关的不利功能,有必要采取长期和短期措施来增强数字公民意识,并对包括公共数据在内的各种数据管理进行有组织的治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
입법영향분석 어떻게 할 것인가? Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act A study on the revision of the “Security Guard Act” and the establishment of 'Congestion Guard' in Japan The Normative Power of the Inter-Korean Agreement The Gap in the Legal Texts and the Supplementation by Interpretation - Focusing on the provisions and interpretations of property rights under Article 23 of the Constitution -
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1