ADDRESSING EMOTIONAL AND RESILIENCE INEQUALITY AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS VIA AN ONLINE ACADEMIC RESILIENCE COURSE

M. Golan, Dor Cohen-Asiag
{"title":"ADDRESSING EMOTIONAL AND RESILIENCE INEQUALITY AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS VIA AN ONLINE ACADEMIC RESILIENCE COURSE","authors":"M. Golan, Dor Cohen-Asiag","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Transitioning from high-school to university challenges young adults to develop greater self-reliance in order to fulfill their needs, engage in relationships, plus adhere to general -self-care, and other healthy behaviors. High-intensity emotions due to difficulties or failure to achieve these goals may result in poor decision-making and impaired self-care (disordered eating, substance abuse, other unfavorable behaviors). This presentation will describe the effects of taking a 13-modules of computerized resilience academic course with a mandatory 1-2 personal assignments for each module. The course effectiveness was assessed via a controlled trial comparing the 124 students that chose to take this elective course and 150 socio-demographic matched controls that did not choose to take this course. At baseline, participants in the research group demonstrated statistical significance lower values compared to the comparison group in the following measures: self-resilience (measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-CD_RISK), self-esteem (measured by Rosenberg Scale), global scores of emotional statuses (measured by depression, anxiety, and pressure scores -Dass-21) and body esteem (measured by the Body Esteem Scale -BES). Thus, all the baseline values were entered as covariates to the ANCOVA Repeated Measures analysis to assess the differences between the intervention and the comparison group along the 4 assessments time: baseline, course termination (after 3.5 months), 3 & 6 months, post-termination. Results revealed a statistically significant superiority to the intervention group in the improvement of all these variables with small effect sizes. At the 6 month’s post course termination, the mean scores of participants in the intervention group reached equality in most variables compared to the mean scores of the comparison group. In some variables they even demonstrated higher scores. The mediating effect of the year that the course was taken and the ethnicity (minorities vs. others) were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the improvement in minorities’ resilience and self-esteem was double compared to the improvement among all others. The improvement in self resilience and self-esteem among first year students was 1.5 times higher than that of the 2nd and 3rd years students. The promising results indicates that emotional and resilience inequality may be addressed via an academic self-learning online-course.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

"Transitioning from high-school to university challenges young adults to develop greater self-reliance in order to fulfill their needs, engage in relationships, plus adhere to general -self-care, and other healthy behaviors. High-intensity emotions due to difficulties or failure to achieve these goals may result in poor decision-making and impaired self-care (disordered eating, substance abuse, other unfavorable behaviors). This presentation will describe the effects of taking a 13-modules of computerized resilience academic course with a mandatory 1-2 personal assignments for each module. The course effectiveness was assessed via a controlled trial comparing the 124 students that chose to take this elective course and 150 socio-demographic matched controls that did not choose to take this course. At baseline, participants in the research group demonstrated statistical significance lower values compared to the comparison group in the following measures: self-resilience (measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-CD_RISK), self-esteem (measured by Rosenberg Scale), global scores of emotional statuses (measured by depression, anxiety, and pressure scores -Dass-21) and body esteem (measured by the Body Esteem Scale -BES). Thus, all the baseline values were entered as covariates to the ANCOVA Repeated Measures analysis to assess the differences between the intervention and the comparison group along the 4 assessments time: baseline, course termination (after 3.5 months), 3 & 6 months, post-termination. Results revealed a statistically significant superiority to the intervention group in the improvement of all these variables with small effect sizes. At the 6 month’s post course termination, the mean scores of participants in the intervention group reached equality in most variables compared to the mean scores of the comparison group. In some variables they even demonstrated higher scores. The mediating effect of the year that the course was taken and the ethnicity (minorities vs. others) were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the improvement in minorities’ resilience and self-esteem was double compared to the improvement among all others. The improvement in self resilience and self-esteem among first year students was 1.5 times higher than that of the 2nd and 3rd years students. The promising results indicates that emotional and resilience inequality may be addressed via an academic self-learning online-course."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在线学术弹性课程解决大学生情绪和弹性不平等问题
“从高中到大学的过渡给年轻人带来了挑战,他们需要培养更大的自立能力,以满足自己的需求,参与人际关系,并坚持一般的自我照顾和其他健康的行为。”由于实现这些目标的困难或失败而产生的高强度情绪可能导致糟糕的决策和自我照顾受损(饮食失调,药物滥用,其他不利行为)。本报告将描述参加13个模块的计算机弹性学术课程的效果,每个模块有1-2个强制性的个人作业。通过对照试验来评估课程的有效性,比较124名选择选修这门课程的学生和150名没有选择选修这门课程的社会人口统计学匹配的对照组。基线时,实验组受试者在自我恢复力(采用康纳-戴维森恢复力量表- cd_risk测量)、自尊(采用罗森伯格量表测量)、情绪状态总体得分(采用抑郁、焦虑和压力得分-Dass-21测量)和身体自尊(采用身体自尊量表-BES测量)方面均较对照组有统计学显著性降低。因此,将所有基线值作为协变量输入ANCOVA重复测量分析,以评估干预组与对照组在4个评估时间(基线、疗程结束(3.5个月后)、3个月和6个月、终止后)之间的差异。结果显示,在所有这些小效应变量的改善方面,干预组具有统计学上显著的优势。在课程结束后6个月,干预组参与者在大多数变量上的平均得分与对照组平均得分持平。在一些变量中,他们甚至表现出更高的分数。选修课程的年份和种族(少数民族与其他民族)的中介效应在统计上不显著。然而,与其他群体相比,少数群体在适应力和自尊方面的改善是其他群体的两倍。一年级学生自我弹性和自尊的改善程度是二年级和三年级学生的1.5倍。这一令人鼓舞的结果表明,情绪和恢复力的不平等可以通过学术自学在线课程来解决。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LINKING MODAL AND AMODAL REPRESENTATIONS THROUGH LANGUAGE COMPUTATIONAL MODELS CLINICAL ASSESSMENT IN A PROFESSIONAL SETTING: ARE THERE IMPLICATIONS FOR SELF-REPORTS OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY? MALADAPTIVE COGNITIONS AND EMOTIONAL REGULATION IN PTSD DOES VACCINE SCARCITY INFLUENCE THE EFFECT OF CONSPIRACY BELIEFS ON INTENTION TO VACCINATE AGAINST COVID-19? SOURCES OF TRANSITION-TO-WORK SELF-EFFICACY: CAREER EXPLORATION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1