E-Corps’ Implementation of Environmental Sustainability-Focused Service-Learning: Conditions Supporting the Establishment of an Epistemic Community

Rebecca A. Campbell-Montalvo, T. Campbell, Byung-Yeol Park, C. Arnold, J. Volin, M. Chrysochoou, Peter C. Diplock
{"title":"E-Corps’ Implementation of Environmental Sustainability-Focused Service-Learning: Conditions Supporting the Establishment of an Epistemic Community","authors":"Rebecca A. Campbell-Montalvo, T. Campbell, Byung-Yeol Park, C. Arnold, J. Volin, M. Chrysochoou, Peter C. Diplock","doi":"10.15695/jstem/v4i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Environmental sustainability-focused service-learning programs can aid communities in addressing environmental problems and provide students with hands-on training. Understanding the implementation of such programs can inform research and application. Purpose: We investigate the implementation of an environmental sustain-ability-focused service-learning program (E-Corps) at a large New England public university. Our inquiry sought to better understand epistemic communities by addressing the research question: What conditions, including contextual factors and resources (i.e., funding, university context) and people (i.e., faculty, their orientation to teaching, how they work together), supported the establishment of an epistemic community in the implementation of E-Corps? Methodology/Approach: We employ frameworks of 1) Design Based Implementation Research (DBIR), which considers problems from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives, collaborative design, pedagogical theory and knowledge, and capacity for sustaining change, and 2) epistemic communities—the stakeholders recursively generating, using, and refining pedagogical knowledge. We themat ically analyzed interviews with students (n=7), two rounds of interviews with faculty (n=7), and participant observations of four E-Corps team meetings (n=13). Findings/Conclusions: Findings show that epistemic community within E-Corps’ implementation was supported by 1) an existing context of resources within the university, and 2) a robust university-part-nership prioritizing community benefits with aligned instructor approaches. Our work informs both research on DBIR and epistemic communities as well as the practical implementation of university-community environmental partnerships.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v4i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Background: Environmental sustainability-focused service-learning programs can aid communities in addressing environmental problems and provide students with hands-on training. Understanding the implementation of such programs can inform research and application. Purpose: We investigate the implementation of an environmental sustain-ability-focused service-learning program (E-Corps) at a large New England public university. Our inquiry sought to better understand epistemic communities by addressing the research question: What conditions, including contextual factors and resources (i.e., funding, university context) and people (i.e., faculty, their orientation to teaching, how they work together), supported the establishment of an epistemic community in the implementation of E-Corps? Methodology/Approach: We employ frameworks of 1) Design Based Implementation Research (DBIR), which considers problems from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives, collaborative design, pedagogical theory and knowledge, and capacity for sustaining change, and 2) epistemic communities—the stakeholders recursively generating, using, and refining pedagogical knowledge. We themat ically analyzed interviews with students (n=7), two rounds of interviews with faculty (n=7), and participant observations of four E-Corps team meetings (n=13). Findings/Conclusions: Findings show that epistemic community within E-Corps’ implementation was supported by 1) an existing context of resources within the university, and 2) a robust university-part-nership prioritizing community benefits with aligned instructor approaches. Our work informs both research on DBIR and epistemic communities as well as the practical implementation of university-community environmental partnerships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E-Corps实施以环境可持续性为重点的服务学习:支持建立认知社区的条件
背景:以环境可持续性为重点的服务学习项目可以帮助社区解决环境问题,并为学生提供实践培训。了解这些程序的实施可以为研究和应用提供信息。目的:我们调查新英格兰一所大型公立大学环境可持续发展服务学习计划(E-Corps)的实施情况。我们的调查旨在通过解决以下研究问题来更好地理解知识共同体:在实施E-Corps的过程中,哪些条件(包括背景因素和资源(即资金、大学背景)和人员(即教师、他们的教学取向、他们如何协同工作)支持了知识共同体的建立?方法论/方法:我们采用以下框架:1)基于设计的实施研究(DBIR),它从多个利益相关者的角度、协作设计、教学理论和知识以及维持变革的能力来考虑问题;2)认知社区——利益相关者递归地生成、使用和提炼教学知识。我们对学生的访谈(n=7)、教师的两轮访谈(n=7)和四次E-Corps团队会议的参与者观察(n=13)进行了专题分析。研究结果/结论:研究结果表明,E-Corps实施中的知识社区得到了以下因素的支持:1)大学内部现有资源背景;2)强有力的大学-合作伙伴关系优先考虑社区利益,并采用一致的教师方法。我们的工作为DBIR和认知社区的研究以及大学-社区环境伙伴关系的实际实施提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DesignYOU! Code Camp: Lessons Learned for Engaging Underserved Youth Arkansas Summer Research Institute: The Evolution of an Engaging Online Training Program in Data Analytics and Research Targeting Underrepresented Students in STEM Inclusive Approaches for Measuring Demographics of Underrepresented Populations in STEM and Biomedical Research Training Programs Summer Cancer Research Experience for High School Students from Historically Marginalized Populations in Kansas City Bringing Research into the Classroom: Bacteriophage Discovery Connecting University Scientists, Students, and Faculty to Rural K-12 Teachers, Students, and Administrators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1