Assessing Factors Associated with COVID19 Risk in Asthma

C. Bloom, P. Cullinan, J. Wedzicha
{"title":"Assessing Factors Associated with COVID19 Risk in Asthma","authors":"C. Bloom, P. Cullinan, J. Wedzicha","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE Several factors may be associated with the apparent reduced risk of severe COVID-19 disease in asthma patients. These include a proposed protective effect from inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or from a type-2 immune airway response. Large UK population cohorts have found conflicting results, but each had missing information on asthma phenotype, including exacerbation history or markers of type-2 inflammation. Protective factors may be determined by comparing the outcomes of asthma patients to other patients using ICS or patients that have similar inflammation. This will be done using a national primary care database linked to secondary care data and Public Health England (PHE) COVID-19 data. METHODS From a primary care database covering around 15% of the UK population, we drew three cohorts of adults (>17 years) with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or allergic rhinitis, and a general population cohort matched by age, gender and primary care practice. COVID-19 infection was defined using three sources: primary care records (confirmed and suspected cases), hospital admissions or PHE data from their surveillance system. Preliminary analysis calculated the proportion of patients diagnosed as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care between 1st February and 22nd June 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between risk factors and COVID-19. RESULTS We identified 729,045 patients with asthma, 280,892 with COPD, 137,312 with allergic rhinitis and 1,138,018 in the general population cohort. 2.2% of the asthma cohort, 3.5% the COPD cohort, 2.4% of the allergic rhinitis cohort and 1.1% of the general population, were identified as having either suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care (approximately a quarter were confirmed). In the asthma cohort, the following were found to be independently significantly associated with having suspected/confirmed COVID-19;older age, being male, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, sleep apnoea, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, chronic renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, dementia and liver disease (all p<0.0001). A history of past or current smoking and a high eosinophil count were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings suggest patients with asthma are more likely to consult primary care about COVID-19 than a matched general population, but less likely than COPD patients, and that type-2 inflammation may not be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 consultation with a primary care physician. Analysis comparing to the other cohorts and the general population, and using data from secondary care and PHE, is ongoing.","PeriodicalId":375809,"journal":{"name":"TP63. TP063 COVID-19 IN ENVIRONMENTAL, OCCUPATIONAL, AND POPULATION HEALTH","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP63. TP063 COVID-19 IN ENVIRONMENTAL, OCCUPATIONAL, AND POPULATION HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE Several factors may be associated with the apparent reduced risk of severe COVID-19 disease in asthma patients. These include a proposed protective effect from inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or from a type-2 immune airway response. Large UK population cohorts have found conflicting results, but each had missing information on asthma phenotype, including exacerbation history or markers of type-2 inflammation. Protective factors may be determined by comparing the outcomes of asthma patients to other patients using ICS or patients that have similar inflammation. This will be done using a national primary care database linked to secondary care data and Public Health England (PHE) COVID-19 data. METHODS From a primary care database covering around 15% of the UK population, we drew three cohorts of adults (>17 years) with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or allergic rhinitis, and a general population cohort matched by age, gender and primary care practice. COVID-19 infection was defined using three sources: primary care records (confirmed and suspected cases), hospital admissions or PHE data from their surveillance system. Preliminary analysis calculated the proportion of patients diagnosed as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care between 1st February and 22nd June 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between risk factors and COVID-19. RESULTS We identified 729,045 patients with asthma, 280,892 with COPD, 137,312 with allergic rhinitis and 1,138,018 in the general population cohort. 2.2% of the asthma cohort, 3.5% the COPD cohort, 2.4% of the allergic rhinitis cohort and 1.1% of the general population, were identified as having either suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care (approximately a quarter were confirmed). In the asthma cohort, the following were found to be independently significantly associated with having suspected/confirmed COVID-19;older age, being male, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, sleep apnoea, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, chronic renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, dementia and liver disease (all p<0.0001). A history of past or current smoking and a high eosinophil count were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings suggest patients with asthma are more likely to consult primary care about COVID-19 than a matched general population, but less likely than COPD patients, and that type-2 inflammation may not be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 consultation with a primary care physician. Analysis comparing to the other cohorts and the general population, and using data from secondary care and PHE, is ongoing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估与哮喘中covid - 19风险相关的因素
几个因素可能与哮喘患者发生严重COVID-19疾病的风险明显降低有关。其中包括吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)或2型气道免疫反应的保护性作用。大型英国人群队列发现了相互矛盾的结果,但每个人都缺少关于哮喘表型的信息,包括恶化史或2型炎症标志物。可以通过比较哮喘患者与其他使用ICS的患者或有类似炎症的患者的结果来确定保护因素。这将使用与二级保健数据和英格兰公共卫生部COVID-19数据相关联的国家初级保健数据库来完成。方法:从覆盖约15%英国人口的初级保健数据库中,我们抽取了3组患有哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)或过敏性鼻炎的成年人(17岁),以及按年龄、性别和初级保健实践匹配的一般人群。COVID-19感染的定义使用三个来源:初级保健记录(确诊和疑似病例)、住院记录或来自其监测系统的公共卫生部门数据。初步分析计算了2020年2月1日至6月22日期间在初级保健中被诊断为疑似或确诊的COVID-19患者的比例。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估危险因素与COVID-19之间的关联。结果:我们在普通人群队列中确定了729,045例哮喘患者,280,892例COPD患者,137,312例变应性鼻炎患者和1,138,018例。在初级保健中,2.2%的哮喘组、3.5%的COPD组、2.4%的过敏性鼻炎组和1.1%的普通人群被确定为疑似或确诊COVID-19(约四分之一被确诊)。在哮喘队列中,发现以下因素与疑似/确诊COVID-19独立显著相关:年龄较大、男性、糖尿病、心血管疾病、肥胖、睡眠呼吸暂停、支气管扩张、COPD、ILD、慢性肾衰竭、脑血管疾病、痴呆和肝病(p<均为0.0001)。既往或当前吸烟史与嗜酸性粒细胞计数高无显著相关性。这些初步研究结果表明,哮喘患者比匹配的普通人群更有可能咨询COVID-19的初级保健,但比COPD患者的可能性更低,并且2型炎症可能与向初级保健医生咨询COVID-19的风险增加无关。正在与其他队列和一般人群进行比较分析,并使用来自二级保健和PHE的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Sparse Bayesian Model Selection Algorithm for Forecasting the Transmission of COVID-19 Relationship Between History of Obesity, Hypertension, Diabetes and COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization with the Presence of Persistent Dyspnea on Exertion and Abnormal Lung Imaging in Convalescent Patients Recovering from COVID-19 Trends in Philadelphia Asthma Encounters and Pollution During the COVID-19 Pandemic Prevalence and Risk of Severe Asthma in Adult Patients with COVID-19 Comparison of Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) to Baseline During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community-Based Healthcare System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1