Combining Stratigraphic Forward Modelling with Multiple-point Statistics - A Case Study from Seismic to Tracer Response

J. Peisker, A. Miller, M. Ebner
{"title":"Combining Stratigraphic Forward Modelling with Multiple-point Statistics - A Case Study from Seismic to Tracer Response","authors":"J. Peisker, A. Miller, M. Ebner","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201902225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Stochastic reservoir modeling is an integral part of quantifying subsurface uncertainties. Classical geostatistical methods like Gaussian random function and multi-point geostatistics (MPS) are robust and cheap in computing time. However, these methods are based on mathematical/statistical concepts and therefore lack geological plausibility. Physical modeling with stratigraphic forward modeling (SFM), on the other hand, is capable of generating detailed 3D simulations of the geological realm. Conditioning SFM to e.g. well log data is expensive and not always successful. A hybrid approach of SFM with MPS can support the conditioning. This approach generates concept driven models that match the well data while also keeping geological continuity. Experiments were done on the mature 7th Tortonian oil reservoir in, Austria. Classical geostatistical approaches failed to generate enough dynamically diverse prior models to envelop the production data. First one geological process (SFM) model was generated and conditioned to well data. The result was then used as a training image (TI) for MPS. These results better match the wells while still preserving the geological information from SFM. All simulation models have been initialized and dynamically simulated. In comparison with the common geostatistical approach, they are dynamically more diverse while being more constrained by geological concepts.","PeriodicalId":186806,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary Stochastic reservoir modeling is an integral part of quantifying subsurface uncertainties. Classical geostatistical methods like Gaussian random function and multi-point geostatistics (MPS) are robust and cheap in computing time. However, these methods are based on mathematical/statistical concepts and therefore lack geological plausibility. Physical modeling with stratigraphic forward modeling (SFM), on the other hand, is capable of generating detailed 3D simulations of the geological realm. Conditioning SFM to e.g. well log data is expensive and not always successful. A hybrid approach of SFM with MPS can support the conditioning. This approach generates concept driven models that match the well data while also keeping geological continuity. Experiments were done on the mature 7th Tortonian oil reservoir in, Austria. Classical geostatistical approaches failed to generate enough dynamically diverse prior models to envelop the production data. First one geological process (SFM) model was generated and conditioned to well data. The result was then used as a training image (TI) for MPS. These results better match the wells while still preserving the geological information from SFM. All simulation models have been initialized and dynamically simulated. In comparison with the common geostatistical approach, they are dynamically more diverse while being more constrained by geological concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合地层正演模拟与多点统计-从地震到示踪反应的案例研究
随机储层建模是量化地下不确定性的重要组成部分。高斯随机函数和多点地质统计等经典地质统计方法具有鲁棒性好、计算时间短等优点。然而,这些方法基于数学/统计概念,因此缺乏地质合理性。另一方面,地层正演模拟(SFM)的物理模拟能够生成详细的地质领域三维模拟。将SFM调整到例如测井数据是昂贵的,而且并不总是成功的。SFM和MPS的混合方法可以支持调节。该方法生成的概念驱动模型与井数据相匹配,同时保持地质连续性。以奥地利托尔顿第七成熟油藏为研究对象,进行了实验研究。经典的地质统计学方法无法生成足够动态多样化的先验模型来涵盖生产数据。首先生成一个地质过程(SFM)模型,并对其进行条件调整。然后将结果用作MPS的训练图像(TI)。这些结果更好地匹配了井,同时仍然保留了SFM的地质信息。所有仿真模型都已初始化并进行了动态仿真。与常用的地质统计方法相比,它们在动态上更加多样化,但更受地质概念的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forward Model Applied to Channelized Turbidite Systems: A Case Study of the Benin Major Valley Fill Stochastic Seismic Inversion Based on a Fuzzy Model A Bayesian Approach for Full-waveform Inversion Using Wide-aperture Seismic Data Ensemble-based Kernel Learning to Handle Rock-physics-model Imperfection in Seismic History Matching: A Real Field Case Study Features of Factor Models in Seismic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1