Application of Soft-Clustering Analysis Using Expectation Maximization Algorithms on Gaussian Mixture Model

Andi Shahifah Muthahharah, M. Tiro, A. Aswi
{"title":"Application of Soft-Clustering Analysis Using Expectation Maximization Algorithms on Gaussian Mixture Model","authors":"Andi Shahifah Muthahharah, M. Tiro, A. Aswi","doi":"10.30812/varian.v6i1.2142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on soft-clustering has not been explored much compared to hard-clustering. Soft-clustering algorithms are important in solving complex clustering problems. One of the soft-clustering methods is the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). GMM is a clustering method to classify data points into different clusters based on the Gaussian distribution. This study aims to determine the number of clusters formed by using the GMM method. The data used in this study is synthetic data on water quality indicators obtained from the Kaggle website. The stages of the GMM method are: imputing the Not Available (NA) value (if there is an NA value), checking the data distribution, conducting a normality test, and standardizing the data. The next step is to estimate the parameters with the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm. The best number of clusters is based on the biggest value of the Bayesian Information Creation (BIC). The results showed that the best number of clusters from synthetic data on water quality indicators was 3 clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 1110 observations with low-quality category, cluster 2 consisted of 499 observations with medium quality category, and cluster 3 consisted of 1667 observations with high-quality category or acceptable. The results of this study recommend that the GMM method can be grouped correctly when the variables used are generally normally distributed. This method can be applied to real data, both in which the variables are normally distributed or which have a mixture of Gaussian and non-Gaussian.","PeriodicalId":188119,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Varian","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Varian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v6i1.2142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on soft-clustering has not been explored much compared to hard-clustering. Soft-clustering algorithms are important in solving complex clustering problems. One of the soft-clustering methods is the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). GMM is a clustering method to classify data points into different clusters based on the Gaussian distribution. This study aims to determine the number of clusters formed by using the GMM method. The data used in this study is synthetic data on water quality indicators obtained from the Kaggle website. The stages of the GMM method are: imputing the Not Available (NA) value (if there is an NA value), checking the data distribution, conducting a normality test, and standardizing the data. The next step is to estimate the parameters with the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm. The best number of clusters is based on the biggest value of the Bayesian Information Creation (BIC). The results showed that the best number of clusters from synthetic data on water quality indicators was 3 clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 1110 observations with low-quality category, cluster 2 consisted of 499 observations with medium quality category, and cluster 3 consisted of 1667 observations with high-quality category or acceptable. The results of this study recommend that the GMM method can be grouped correctly when the variables used are generally normally distributed. This method can be applied to real data, both in which the variables are normally distributed or which have a mixture of Gaussian and non-Gaussian.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期望最大化软聚类分析在高斯混合模型中的应用
相对于硬聚类,软聚类的研究还不够深入。软聚类算法是解决复杂聚类问题的重要方法。软聚类方法之一是高斯混合模型(GMM)。GMM是一种基于高斯分布将数据点划分到不同聚类中的聚类方法。本研究旨在利用GMM方法确定形成的聚类数量。本研究使用的数据是在Kaggle网站上获得的水质指标综合数据。GMM法的步骤包括:计算NA (Not Available)值(如果有NA)、检查数据分布、进行正态性检验和数据标准化。下一步是用期望最大化(EM)算法估计参数。最佳集群数量是基于贝叶斯信息创造(BIC)的最大值。结果表明,水质指标综合数据的最佳聚类数为3个。聚类1包括1110个低质量类别的观测值,聚类2包括499个中等质量类别的观测值,聚类3包括1667个高质量或可接受的观测值。本研究结果表明,当使用的变量一般为正态分布时,GMM方法可以正确分组。该方法可以应用于变量为正态分布或高斯和非高斯混合分布的实际数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Principal Component Regression in Analyzing Factors Affecting Human Development Index Impact of SST Anomalies on Coral Reefs Damage Based on Copula Analysis The NADI Mathematical Model on the Danger Level of the Bili-Bili Dam Regression Model of Land Area and Amount of Production to the Selling Price of Corn K-Means – Resilient Backpropagation Neural Network in Predicting Poverty Levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1