Phantom array and stroboscopic effect visibility under combinations of TLM parameters

N. Miller, E. Rodriguez-Feo Bermudez, L. Irvin, J. Tan
{"title":"Phantom array and stroboscopic effect visibility under combinations of TLM parameters","authors":"N. Miller, E. Rodriguez-Feo Bermudez, L. Irvin, J. Tan","doi":"10.1177/14771535231169904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solid-state light sources can be more prone to larger temporal light modulation (TLM) than conventional sources. TLM visibility depends on wave shape, frequency, modulation depth and duty cycle, and is affected by the sensitivity of the observer. TLM can be visible well above the critical flicker fusion frequency, when there is relative movement between the observer’s eyes and light source, lighted space or moving objects in the field of view. This human subjects experiment explored visibility of the stroboscopic effect (SE) versus the phantom array effect (PAE) with targeted tasks under 74 TLM waveforms. The results showed the SE visibility peaks between 90 Hz and 120 Hz, while the PAE visibility peaks between 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. The phantom array is visible to sensitive participants at 6000 Hz. Both effects are more visible under rectangular versus sinusoidal TLM, higher modulation, and when duty cycles are 10% or 30% versus 50%. Higher sensitivity participants, differentiated using the Leiden Visual Sensitivity Scale, rated TLM waveforms as more visible, especially those inherently harder to see. This work lays a foundation for a PAE metric and guides driver and dimmer designers toward electronic circuits that minimize the visibility of TLM in LED products.","PeriodicalId":269493,"journal":{"name":"Lighting Research & Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lighting Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535231169904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid-state light sources can be more prone to larger temporal light modulation (TLM) than conventional sources. TLM visibility depends on wave shape, frequency, modulation depth and duty cycle, and is affected by the sensitivity of the observer. TLM can be visible well above the critical flicker fusion frequency, when there is relative movement between the observer’s eyes and light source, lighted space or moving objects in the field of view. This human subjects experiment explored visibility of the stroboscopic effect (SE) versus the phantom array effect (PAE) with targeted tasks under 74 TLM waveforms. The results showed the SE visibility peaks between 90 Hz and 120 Hz, while the PAE visibility peaks between 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. The phantom array is visible to sensitive participants at 6000 Hz. Both effects are more visible under rectangular versus sinusoidal TLM, higher modulation, and when duty cycles are 10% or 30% versus 50%. Higher sensitivity participants, differentiated using the Leiden Visual Sensitivity Scale, rated TLM waveforms as more visible, especially those inherently harder to see. This work lays a foundation for a PAE metric and guides driver and dimmer designers toward electronic circuits that minimize the visibility of TLM in LED products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TLM参数组合下的幻影阵列和频闪效应可见性
固态光源比传统光源更容易产生较大的时间光调制(TLM)。TLM可见性取决于波形、频率、调制深度和占空比,并受观测者灵敏度的影响。当观察者的眼睛与光源、照明空间或视场中移动的物体之间存在相对运动时,TLM可以在远高于临界闪烁融合频率的情况下可见。本实验探讨了74种TLM波形下目标任务的频闪效应(SE)与幻相阵列效应(PAE)的可见性。结果表明,东南能见度峰值在90 ~ 120 Hz之间,PAE能见度峰值在500 ~ 1000 Hz之间。在6000赫兹的频率下,敏感的参与者可以看到幻像阵列。当占空比为10%或30%而不是50%时,这两种效应在矩形TLM和正弦TLM下更明显。高灵敏度的参与者,用莱顿视觉灵敏度量表进行区分,认为TLM波形更明显,尤其是那些本来就很难看到的波形。这项工作为PAE度量奠定了基础,并指导驱动器和调光器设计人员朝着最大限度地减少TLM在LED产品中的可见性的电子电路发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining daytime in the day-dark approach to measuring the pedestrian reassurance of road lighting Editorial: The many faces of sustainability in lighting research Recommendations for light-dosimetry field studies based on a meta-analysis of personal light levels of office workers Opinion: Embracing ‘anthropogenic’ over ‘artificial’ light at night Opinion: The role of outdoor lighting with pedestrian reassurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1