{"title":"Scrolls, Testament and Talmud: Issues of Antisemitism in the Study of Ancient Judaism","authors":"L. Schiffman","doi":"10.1515/9783110618594-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of ancient Judaism raises numerous issues regarding antisemitism such as: Greco-Roman antisemitism and early antisemitic (or anti-Judaic) literature,1 early Jewish-Christian relations,2 and antagonism to the Jews in Babylonia.3 These phenomena continue to be studied by numerous scholars. What has been lacking in research is a meta-analysis that seeks to show how antisemitism has affected the study not only of ancient anti-Judaism but of ancient Judaism and Jewish history in Late Antiquity as a whole. Aspects of this problem include the effects of antisemitism on descriptive terms for Judaism in Antiquity and Late Antiquity; approaches to periodization within the larger ancient historical framework; construal of Jews and Judaism in light of New Testament images and later anti-Jewish material in the Church Fathers; effects of the Reformation and Protestantism on views of the Jews and Judaism; and numerous such topics. More recently, there has been fundamental questioning of the basic geographical and historical facts of ancient Jewish history as a result of modern Middle Eastern issues, to name just a few of the most prominent problems. Some might wonder why one would consider the field of Judaic Studies at a conference devoted to antisemitism. At first glance, it would appear that Judaic Studies is itself a strong antidote to anti-Jewish/Judaic prejudice. Indeed such a notion lay behind the rise of the Wissenschaft des Judentums, the scientific study of Judaism, as it developed in Germany and elsewhere in the nineteenth century.4 Its earliest advocates thought it could be utilized as a strategy for combating","PeriodicalId":418945,"journal":{"name":"Comprehending and Confronting Antisemitism","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehending and Confronting Antisemitism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618594-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The study of ancient Judaism raises numerous issues regarding antisemitism such as: Greco-Roman antisemitism and early antisemitic (or anti-Judaic) literature,1 early Jewish-Christian relations,2 and antagonism to the Jews in Babylonia.3 These phenomena continue to be studied by numerous scholars. What has been lacking in research is a meta-analysis that seeks to show how antisemitism has affected the study not only of ancient anti-Judaism but of ancient Judaism and Jewish history in Late Antiquity as a whole. Aspects of this problem include the effects of antisemitism on descriptive terms for Judaism in Antiquity and Late Antiquity; approaches to periodization within the larger ancient historical framework; construal of Jews and Judaism in light of New Testament images and later anti-Jewish material in the Church Fathers; effects of the Reformation and Protestantism on views of the Jews and Judaism; and numerous such topics. More recently, there has been fundamental questioning of the basic geographical and historical facts of ancient Jewish history as a result of modern Middle Eastern issues, to name just a few of the most prominent problems. Some might wonder why one would consider the field of Judaic Studies at a conference devoted to antisemitism. At first glance, it would appear that Judaic Studies is itself a strong antidote to anti-Jewish/Judaic prejudice. Indeed such a notion lay behind the rise of the Wissenschaft des Judentums, the scientific study of Judaism, as it developed in Germany and elsewhere in the nineteenth century.4 Its earliest advocates thought it could be utilized as a strategy for combating
对古代犹太教的研究提出了许多关于反犹主义的问题,如:希腊-罗马反犹主义和早期反犹主义(或反犹太主义)文学,1早期犹太-基督教关系,2以及对巴比伦犹太人的对抗。3这些现象继续被许多学者研究。研究中缺乏的是一项荟萃分析,旨在表明反犹主义不仅影响了古代反犹太教的研究,而且影响了古代犹太教和上古晚期整个犹太历史的研究。这个问题的各个方面包括反犹主义对古代和古代晚期犹太教描述性术语的影响;在更大的古代历史框架内的分期方法;根据《新约》中的形象和后来《教父》中的反犹太材料来解释犹太人和犹太教;宗教改革和新教对犹太人和犹太教观念的影响;还有很多这样的话题。最近,由于现代中东问题,人们对古代犹太历史的基本地理和历史事实提出了根本性的质疑,这里仅列举几个最突出的问题。有些人可能会奇怪,为什么有人会在一个专门讨论反犹主义的会议上考虑犹太研究领域。乍一看,犹太研究本身似乎是反犹太人/犹太人偏见的有力解毒剂。事实上,这种观念是19世纪在德国和其他地方发展起来的犹太教科学研究Wissenschaft des Judentums兴起的原因最早的倡导者认为它可以作为一种战斗策略