A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Techniques for Predicting Binary Dependent Variables

Tianxiang Cao, Xin Song, Jun Wang
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Techniques for Predicting Binary Dependent Variables","authors":"Tianxiang Cao, Xin Song, Jun Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Invoice Disputes Team wants to identify further opportunities to reduce invoice disputes and the team would like to explore whether data analytics can drive further improvements. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the eight approaches to predict binary dependent variables according to the specified data. The techniques examined are Logistic Regression, Probit Regression, CHAID, CART, Neural Networks, Bagging, Random Forests and Boosting. This paper describes the data set, the effectiveness measures used and the approaches, and also shows the results for each of the eight approaches that are examined. The simulation results show that both Bagging and Random forests seem to do better than other approaches.","PeriodicalId":325919,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Invoice Disputes Team wants to identify further opportunities to reduce invoice disputes and the team would like to explore whether data analytics can drive further improvements. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the eight approaches to predict binary dependent variables according to the specified data. The techniques examined are Logistic Regression, Probit Regression, CHAID, CART, Neural Networks, Bagging, Random Forests and Boosting. This paper describes the data set, the effectiveness measures used and the approaches, and also shows the results for each of the eight approaches that are examined. The simulation results show that both Bagging and Random forests seem to do better than other approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二元因变量预测技术的有效性比较
发票争议团队希望找到更多的机会来减少发票争议,团队希望探索数据分析是否可以推动进一步的改进。本文的目的是比较根据指定数据预测二元因变量的八种方法的有效性。研究的技术包括逻辑回归、概率回归、CHAID、CART、神经网络、Bagging、随机森林和Boosting。本文描述了数据集、使用的有效性度量和方法,并显示了所检查的八种方法中的每种方法的结果。仿真结果表明,套袋法和随机森林法似乎都比其他方法效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Running Pace Adjustment and Training Distance Fitting with Fuzzy Logic and Machine Learning Low Quality Samples Detection in Motor Imagery EEG Data by Combining Independent Component Analysis and Confident Learning Application and Certification Mechanism of Active Identification Carrier in the Industrial Internet Fuzzy Logic Based Agent Selection for Failure Management in VANETs A Knowledge- Distillation - Integrated Pruning Method for Vision Transformer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1