Understanding Technology in Modern Culture: methodological reconstruction of philosophical approaches

N. Popkova
{"title":"Understanding Technology in Modern Culture: methodological reconstruction of philosophical approaches","authors":"N. Popkova","doi":"10.7256/2454-0625.2022.9.36099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the research is philosophical approaches to the analysis of technology reflecting the understanding of technology in modern culture. The problematization of technology occurs in connection with the desire of people to control it, reducing the determinism of their lives by external forces. To explain the connection between technology and man, numerous philosophical approaches have been proposed — systems of views expressing a certain way of seeing and based on basic concepts (reflecting the main aspects of the subject of research). Depending on the properties attributed to the technique and the goals of study, these approaches offer various forms of its awareness and practical development. At the existing level of philosophical knowledge, these concepts are not systematized and not coordinated; implied assumptions are not formulated openly, the main problems and prerequisites of the study, the factors taken into account, the meaning of the terms used are not always explicitly stated.   The author comes to the conclusion that the analysis of these approaches with the help of logical reconstruction will bring the greatest methodological benefit: the identification of philosophical concepts (including the articulation of unconscious ideas), their comparison and analysis of methodological foundations (identification of the principles underlying them). It is concluded that the following have the greatest potential for research: a socio-natural approach analyzing nature and human society (generating technology) as steps of a single ladder of evolution having common laws of functioning; a sociotechnological approach considering socio-cultural and technical practices as generated by the communication environment; a biotechnological approach exploring natural and technical systems as successive stages of the evolution of the Universe, not taking into account the subjective factor of technology development. As a result, developing a philosophy of technology that combines all the diversity of these approaches and explains their mutual correspondence, we will analyze the anthropological foundations of technical activity.\n","PeriodicalId":184304,"journal":{"name":"Культура и искусство","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Культура и искусство","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2022.9.36099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the research is philosophical approaches to the analysis of technology reflecting the understanding of technology in modern culture. The problematization of technology occurs in connection with the desire of people to control it, reducing the determinism of their lives by external forces. To explain the connection between technology and man, numerous philosophical approaches have been proposed — systems of views expressing a certain way of seeing and based on basic concepts (reflecting the main aspects of the subject of research). Depending on the properties attributed to the technique and the goals of study, these approaches offer various forms of its awareness and practical development. At the existing level of philosophical knowledge, these concepts are not systematized and not coordinated; implied assumptions are not formulated openly, the main problems and prerequisites of the study, the factors taken into account, the meaning of the terms used are not always explicitly stated.   The author comes to the conclusion that the analysis of these approaches with the help of logical reconstruction will bring the greatest methodological benefit: the identification of philosophical concepts (including the articulation of unconscious ideas), their comparison and analysis of methodological foundations (identification of the principles underlying them). It is concluded that the following have the greatest potential for research: a socio-natural approach analyzing nature and human society (generating technology) as steps of a single ladder of evolution having common laws of functioning; a sociotechnological approach considering socio-cultural and technical practices as generated by the communication environment; a biotechnological approach exploring natural and technical systems as successive stages of the evolution of the Universe, not taking into account the subjective factor of technology development. As a result, developing a philosophy of technology that combines all the diversity of these approaches and explains their mutual correspondence, we will analyze the anthropological foundations of technical activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解现代文化中的技术:哲学方法的方法论重建
研究的主题是分析技术的哲学方法,反映了现代文化对技术的理解。技术的问题化与人们控制它的欲望有关,减少了外界力量对他们生活的决定性。为了解释技术与人之间的联系,人们提出了许多哲学方法——以基本概念(反映研究主题的主要方面)为基础,表达某种观察方式的观点体系。根据技术的属性和研究目标,这些方法提供了各种形式的意识和实践发展。在现有的哲学知识层面上,这些概念没有被系统化和协调性;隐含的假设没有公开制定,研究的主要问题和先决条件,考虑到的因素,所使用的术语的含义并不总是明确说明。作者得出的结论是,在逻辑重构的帮助下对这些方法进行分析将带来最大的方法论利益:哲学概念的识别(包括无意识观念的表达),它们的比较和方法论基础的分析(识别它们背后的原则)。结论是,以下研究具有最大的潜力:一种社会-自然方法,将自然和人类社会(产生技术)作为具有共同功能规律的单一进化阶梯的步骤进行分析;一种社会技术方法,考虑由传播环境产生的社会文化和技术实践;一种生物技术方法,将自然系统和技术系统作为宇宙演化的连续阶段来探索,不考虑技术发展的主观因素。因此,发展一种结合所有这些方法的多样性并解释它们相互对应的技术哲学,我们将分析技术活动的人类学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Figures “Representing the Kingdoms, Grand Principalities, and Other Regions and Provinces of the Russian Empire, with Their Coats Of Arms”: Personifications of Territories in 18th-century Russian Art The visual content of neural networks as a return to the third-order simulacrum Vocal and arranging solutions for broadcasting Kuban Cossack folk songs: methodology and practice The visual content of neural networks as a return to the third-order simulacrum Vocal and arranging solutions for broadcasting Kuban Cossack folk songs: methodology and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1