BYOD strategies in higher education: current knowledge, students’ perspectives, and challenges.

A. Siani
{"title":"BYOD strategies in higher education: current knowledge, students’ perspectives, and challenges.","authors":"A. Siani","doi":"10.29311/NDTPS.V0I12.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of mobile computing devices has become an integral part of virtually every aspect of our personal and professional life, and education is no exception to this paradigm. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategies are becoming increasingly prevalent in teaching, learning and assessment across all age groups, however the evaluation of their relative effectiveness compared to traditional pedagogies is still a controversial matter. Despite the vast number of reports attesting the successful integration of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that a significant proportion of the studies on the topic are highly heterogeneous from both a theoretical and methodological standpoint. While BYOD strategies have been put in place in an increasing number of educational institutions around the world, the extent of their implementation varies widely between (and in most cases within) different institutions. This observation highlights the critical importance of the development of a solid theoretical and practical framework to underpin the integration of BYOD in higher education. The first part of this paper will aim to critically evaluate the state of the art of the literature on the efficacy of BYOD strategies in higher education, highlighting potential benefits and drawbacks. As a paradigmatic example of caveats arising from the use of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that teaching and learning strategies based on the use of personal mobile computing devices may pose a significant risk to aggravate digital divide between students who have access to (and operational mastery of) such devices, and students who do not. The critical evaluation of the advantages and pitfalls of BYOD will be used as a theoretical scaffold for the second part of the paper, which will outline the results of a recent case study to give a practical account of the implementation of BYOD in higher education. A survey was carried out within a cohort of level 4 Biology, Biochemistry, and Marine Biology students to investigate the students’ perception of the effectiveness of Nearpod as a formative assessment tool. While the majority (65%) of the participants had never used BYOD in an educational context before enrolling into university, the students’ account of its efficacy appears overwhelmingly positive. Most students expressed a clear preference for electronic formative assessment and commended its superior helpfulness compared to traditional methods. The vast majority of the participants (over 90%) did not perceive BYOD as potentially aggravating digital divide among their peers. Keywords: BYOD; higher education; electronic; interactive; formative assessment; digital divide; personal computing devices; smartphone; tablet; laptop.","PeriodicalId":174795,"journal":{"name":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29311/NDTPS.V0I12.824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The use of mobile computing devices has become an integral part of virtually every aspect of our personal and professional life, and education is no exception to this paradigm. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategies are becoming increasingly prevalent in teaching, learning and assessment across all age groups, however the evaluation of their relative effectiveness compared to traditional pedagogies is still a controversial matter. Despite the vast number of reports attesting the successful integration of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that a significant proportion of the studies on the topic are highly heterogeneous from both a theoretical and methodological standpoint. While BYOD strategies have been put in place in an increasing number of educational institutions around the world, the extent of their implementation varies widely between (and in most cases within) different institutions. This observation highlights the critical importance of the development of a solid theoretical and practical framework to underpin the integration of BYOD in higher education. The first part of this paper will aim to critically evaluate the state of the art of the literature on the efficacy of BYOD strategies in higher education, highlighting potential benefits and drawbacks. As a paradigmatic example of caveats arising from the use of BYOD in higher education, it has been argued that teaching and learning strategies based on the use of personal mobile computing devices may pose a significant risk to aggravate digital divide between students who have access to (and operational mastery of) such devices, and students who do not. The critical evaluation of the advantages and pitfalls of BYOD will be used as a theoretical scaffold for the second part of the paper, which will outline the results of a recent case study to give a practical account of the implementation of BYOD in higher education. A survey was carried out within a cohort of level 4 Biology, Biochemistry, and Marine Biology students to investigate the students’ perception of the effectiveness of Nearpod as a formative assessment tool. While the majority (65%) of the participants had never used BYOD in an educational context before enrolling into university, the students’ account of its efficacy appears overwhelmingly positive. Most students expressed a clear preference for electronic formative assessment and commended its superior helpfulness compared to traditional methods. The vast majority of the participants (over 90%) did not perceive BYOD as potentially aggravating digital divide among their peers. Keywords: BYOD; higher education; electronic; interactive; formative assessment; digital divide; personal computing devices; smartphone; tablet; laptop.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中的BYOD策略:当前的知识、学生的观点和挑战。
移动计算设备的使用已经成为我们个人生活和职业生活的方方面面不可或缺的一部分,教育也不例外。自带设备(BYOD)策略在所有年龄组的教学、学习和评估中越来越普遍,然而,与传统教学法相比,对其相对有效性的评估仍然是一个有争议的问题。尽管大量的报告证明了BYOD在高等教育中的成功整合,但有人认为,从理论和方法的角度来看,关于这一主题的很大一部分研究都是高度异质的。虽然BYOD战略已经在世界各地越来越多的教育机构中实施,但其实施程度在不同机构之间(大多数情况下在不同机构内部)差异很大。这一观察结果强调了建立一个坚实的理论和实践框架的重要性,以支持BYOD在高等教育中的整合。本文的第一部分旨在批判性地评估有关BYOD策略在高等教育中的有效性的文献的现状,突出潜在的好处和缺点。作为在高等教育中使用自带设备引起的警告的一个典型例子,有人认为,基于个人移动计算设备使用的教学和学习策略可能会造成严重的风险,加剧能够使用(并掌握)此类设备的学生与不能使用此类设备的学生之间的数字鸿沟。对BYOD的优势和缺陷的批判性评估将被用作论文第二部分的理论框架,该部分将概述最近的一个案例研究的结果,以给出在高等教育中实施BYOD的实际说明。在一组4级生物学、生物化学和海洋生物学学生中进行了一项调查,以调查学生对Nearpod作为形成性评估工具的有效性的看法。虽然大多数(65%)的参与者在进入大学之前从未在教育背景下使用过自带设备,但学生们对其有效性的描述似乎非常积极。大多数学生表达了对电子形成性评估的明确偏好,并赞扬其与传统方法相比更有帮助。绝大多数受访者(超过90%)并不认为自带设备可能会加剧同龄人之间的数字鸿沟。关键词:BYOD;高等教育;电子;互动;形成性评价;数字鸿沟;个人电脑设备;智能手机;平板电脑;移动PC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Career Preparedness of Chemistry Graduates Challenges and Opportunities for Online Practical Work in Sub-Saharan Africa Student perspectives on online lectures during the Covid-19 lockdown Supporting student collaboration in online breakout rooms through interactive group activities Improving Graduate Futures and Employability Through Embedded Industrial Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1